Re: Announcing Unofficial Version 1.2 of bp-skeleton-component
It wasn’t not being able to get it working, more of an observation.
Ah, I misunderstood.
Do you think it makes sense to comment out a version of the populate() that shows it taking an argument? Or just reference some files where that happens?
Of course, we don’t want to make the skeleton too complex or cluttered with comments. Perhaps what needs to be done is document custom component development in the codex. Sort of a simple users’ manual that references various functions that may be useful to examine as examples.
Andy, if you’re reading this, I would appreciate your thoughts and comments on this unofficial v1.2 of the skeleton component. Obviously, there’s no big rush.