BuddyPress.org

Do you mean in the text of the email, or the name in the “From” address?

The error suggests your problem is in the bp-registration-options plugin.

Out of scope. Activity has favouriting, and that will continue.

We’re not adding new functionality to messaging in 1.7. You can’t forward in 1.6, so you can’t in 1.7.

Can you file a bug report to https://buddypress.trac.wordpress.org please, with some example usernames and exact steps how to create the bug. You can use your username and password from this site. Thanks

WordPress 3.5 is required for this.

No

Sending any password in an email is a terrible idea. It’s not secure.

Users need to log in before they show up in the member directory. Are you sure they have?

Someone’s provided a patch on Github for this, but I haven’t checked it out yet: https://github.com/paulgibbs/BP-Labs/pull/1

Easiest way is to just read the code. Look from here onwards: https://buddypress.trac.wordpress.org/browser/branches/1.6/bp-groups/bp-groups-classes.php#L1265

Versions of BuddyPress prior to 1.2 had a very similar feature. You could try downloading a 1.1.x version of BuddyPress and investigating its templates. Be warned, all most everything’s changed, so you would need […]

Request for what? If you’re going to resurrect an 8 month old forum post, at least provide more information as to what your concern is, or better yet, start a new thread.

FWIW, BP 1.6 included a fix to some of […]

How would we (or a plugin) add those items to that metabox? Those items are post types, right?

Closing this in favour of https://buddypress.org/community/groups/how-to-and-troubleshooting/forum/topic/what-is-the-command-to-get-the-current-group-id/

Don’t bump your post within 3 hours.

Roger, not as easy as it seems. We have a bot that minimises our CSS + JS files on commit (shared with WordPress core, and bbPress core, and other Automattic projects). AFAIK, it doesn’t support LESS etc. That’s […]

Replying to this thread isn’t going to get the problem resolved any quicker 🙂

Thanks for taking the initiative!

I’d suggest using the least specific selectors, and only make them more specific if and when it’s needed. The classes themselves will probably be prefixed to minimise any name conflict.