BuddyPress.org

Er you’ve used #container twice best to either lose the second or change it to #content-wrap and it’s best not to state explicit dimensions unless a need to so the inner element doesn’t need width:660px just let it default to 100% of it’s parent and then you can use padding or margins safely. The font […]

Perhaps needs re-titling then?

There is a limit to how much instruction you can give and a point where people who want to ‘Do’ certain stuff actually have to invest a modicum of time in learning how – much like most of have had to. Part of the trouble is always going to be that the template pack and […]

The predominant raison d’etre for this plugin is to invite new members to the site so not having any existing members isn’t really an issue. As far as I’m aware there are no issues, I have had it running on a few test installs and live on a production site and no issues have been […]

Landing page? By that do you mean the main screen in a profile/members account? The plugin doesn’t use physical page templates as such it’s using the inject into existing plugin.php file approach. The screens in the members account area have their markup in /by-email/by-email.php and it’s loaded into the themes /members/single/plugins.php, so you…[Read more]

They would be great going together if only WP would initiate some other form of adding content areas without having to call them ‘sidebars’ which at the best of times is not great naming convention, describe what the content is not it’s presentation.

< Quote=Arras wrote>Automattic (the company behind WordPress) is doing the development of buddypress </quote> No they aren’t! They may have nabbed the lead developer and possibly copyrighted the name but they aren’t ‘doing’ the development; it’s an open source project and the development is lead by a small group of volunteers. But the theme looks…

Nice one – I’ll run an update on trunk locally and have a look at that in the morning. (note: avoided the overused ‘Awsome’ but that is not meant to denigrate your effort 🙂 ) BTW it’s probably worth following 2010’s lead and switching to a plain HTML System Doctype without formal identifiers what people […]

Linked to twice! the site admin will backtrace here and wonder if we’re trying to encourage his badges be ‘Borrowed’ 🙂

erm we do need to leave something for people to have to do 😉 Pauls done the hard work, users will have to spend a fraction of the time setting up, configuring etc, Not everything can always work out of the box with no user participation. That said I can see the benefit of some […]

and so you now need to follow the instructions I outlined above.

But you haven’t created any rules for sidebar so it can only sit in the flow??!! It looks as though #sidebar needs to be placed after your #sidebar-content element has closed as you have rules for a classic source order arrangement with #content-sidebar floated 100% width and it’s first child given a right margin to […]

There is already a ticket and a patch for this as well as a support thread 🙂 expect the patch committed in 1.2.7

https://buddypress.org/community/groups/how-to-and-troubleshooting/forum/topic/time-offset-still-present-in-bp-1-2-6/

However you are reporting quite a time difference? but this is a long running issue but should be corrected with…[Read more]

Simply go through the BP files and remove the sidebar call!

@zomex ignore the query string it’s a version string appended when the style sheet is added to the output of the page and is simply a method used to force refresh of browser cache , it’s appended to the file after the fact and no file actually exists physically with a query string, just edit the […]

Added a footnote to the ‘blog tracking’ list item on https://codex.buddypress.org/getting-started/configure-buddypress-components/

It perhaps also needs reference elsewhere as well.

@r-a-y (Sidenote: me thinks we need a BP codex article to setup the blogs component) by that do you mean multi site feature? if so is that not really a WP issue and well covered in their codex, with perhaps BP codex just needing to reference that WP page, subscribing to a variation of DRY […]

The results don’t make sense do they? in the ‘Required’ list it references wp_footer as missing but how could it be ? it only features in the one file doesn’t it? footer.php and in the bp-default files it’s present. Strikes me that the automated process is confused by some aspect of the BP structure but […]

The link to the patch is here:
https://trac.buddypress.org/attachment/ticket/2203/omgpizza.patch

ticket is here:
https://trac.buddypress.org/ticket/2203