BuddyPress.org

Hi. I don’t know what you mean. Can you post an image of the problem to imgur or imgbb or similar?

There are several ways to edit messages. Since these messages are filtered (it’s applied here: https://github.com/buddypress/BuddyPress/blob/5.0.0/src/bp-templates/bp-nouveau/includes/functions.php#L932), you could add something like this in your bp-custom.php file:


add_filter( 'bp_nouveau_feedback_messages', function ( $messages )…[Read more]

Users are considered “active” when they have contributed something to the site. This is judged by whether they have an item in the bp_activity table. You could add fake last_activity items directly to the database table to make it look like they are active users.

You could also change the loop templates (like members/members-loop.php) to actually…[Read more]

Hi @ibes–

I’d try to use Xprofile for managing profile fields. There’s a lot of baked-in goodness with the Xprofile component.

Obviously, I don’t know what will work in your situation, but it seems like name matching is reasonable. You could probably also extend the Xprofile Groups and Fields classes to add some sort of persistent-ID parameter…[Read more]

Hi Tom-

I’d guess that you (or the previous site admin) edited the Display Name field to be called “Name.” You can check by visiting this screen on your installation: /wp-admin/users.php?page=bp-profile-setup

“Display Name” is usually the first profile field created, so if you inspect the input, and it has the name=field_1, then you can guess…[Read more]

David (@dcavins), do you have any ideas why I wouldn’t be seeing the Display Name under Edit Profile, as you said it should? Or why Buddypress overrides important BBpress fields for editing the forum profile? I think there must be a way around this. I do not see that Memberpress is involved in this profile page at all (no apparent mepr classes or…[Read more]

Hi Slava

What an awesome function! Just what I was looking for 🙂

It still works on my BuddyPress setup, but I just wanna know if you have made the function even more elegant or if you have solved the issue in another way.

Thanks
Torben