Re: Activity DB Design Discussion
@ron/@maz@andy, I think that’s the way to go, and not unlike what already happens in terms of how activity gets in there.
I do like the idea of private messages going in there too… Huh.
Is it possible Andy that you just made one component to eliminate all the others? haha! I mean really if components can register themselves, then there’s no need for an activitymeta table, since the very act of interacting with an activity stream is in itself an activity. Think of the traditional facebook like/dislike setup. When I “dislike” a comment, that creates an activity that I disliked it, which is attached to the activity item I disliked.
It’s rather genius in a way. Huh again…
