Search Results for 'bots'
-
AuthorSearch Results
-
November 12, 2009 at 7:22 am #56524
In reply to: What do your spam signups look like?
Mariusooms
ParticipantSame problem,started about a few days ago. Bots are signing up a few times a day, firstnamelastname19xx.
Interesting is that I notice in my stats some ip found my site by searching for “proudly powered by WordPress MU and BuddyPress”.That could be a reason that this particular bot is finding and attacking bussypress installs.
If this bot is getting past Captcha, I would recommend applying a reverse Captcha technique. Just do a bit of Googling on this, it uses a hidden field as a honey pot which bots will fill in, but normal users will not. When filled in you can redirect them to a page of your choosing.
Please report your findings and how you deal with this as it would be very helpful.
November 12, 2009 at 6:38 am #56522In reply to: What do your spam signups look like?
stwc
ParticipantAs a first attempt, I’ve tried changing the register slug in wp-config and some of the phrasing used on register.php (after copying it from bp-sn-parent to my child theme) to see what happens… will report back on whether or not it confuses the bots.
November 11, 2009 at 1:55 pm #56450In reply to: Last users to view profile
Jeff Sayre
ParticipantData on who viewed a given user’s profile is not stored in the database. To accomplish this task, you would have to write your own plugin and add at least one new table to the DB.
However, depending on how the plugin was coded, on even a moderately active site, this/these new table(s) could grow to a very large size. For instance, if a given site was not set up to disallow viewing of users’ profiles unless the viewer was logged in, all sorts of useless visitor hits would be encountered–unknown actual people viewing a profile, search engine bots visiting a profile for purposes of indexing, etcetera.
Of course, the solution would be to code the plugin to ignore those type of hits and only log actual logged in member views. But then the number of true views would be greatly undercounted.
November 1, 2009 at 6:23 pm #55625gazouteast
ParticipantHi Jeff – key comment in this reply is the last line

So, if your source image is smaller than 150 on at least one of its dimensions, you could have issues with creating the large avatar. If it is smaller than 50 on at least one of its dimensions, you could have issues with creating the small and large avatar
So what happened to css basics?
e.g.
maximum-width; 150px
note the use of maximum-width as opposed to width – or is that not available in javascript ? (genuine query as I don’t know js coding at all) – also, note the dimensions I gave in reply to Xevo way back up the thread.
it may be that your server is running too old of a version of the GD image library
possible, though highly unlikely with this particular host – I’ll check with them though.
never use the auto-upgrade feature when upgrading WPMU or BuddyPress. It is simple and quick enough to manually upgrade them and it gives you more control and assurance that it is done right.
Side topic response, but – I’m 2,000 miles from the closest of my servers (Singapore) and 8,000 from the main one where the install is running a deadline, and 12,000 from the US hosts that I also use heavily. It is NEVER quick to manually download the package, extract it and upload it from here – assuming the locals can keep the electric on for more than an hour at a time, and the internet connected for two consecutive minutes – that’s why the auto-upgrader was such a godsend when it arrived in 2.5 Having said that, I’ve noticed some very consistent differences on it with UK and US hosts – both the auto upgrader and the plugins/theme direct download to site and upgrades, work flawlessly on US hosts and never ask for FTP login. On UK hosts, they all always ask for FTP user login from wp-admin, and greater than 50% of the time they fail to complete all expected on-screen steps. I’ve also noticed that UK hosts tend to override the timeout preventions built into WP, which US hosts do not do. ….. don’t get me started on the pricing differences either – LOL
Are you on a shared or dedicated server? Talk with your hosting firm to see if there is some javascript-based application that the hosting firm has running on your server that could be interfering with the basic JS operations in WPMU
It’s a shared server, but a reseller account – half way step between shared and VPS as in limited main accounts per server but with dedicated RAM per reseller account and so on.
The background js / mootools question is a good one that I’ll fire at them.
On the UK install, I’ve tried every possible config right down to the barest of bones – even to the point of deleting (not just deactivating) all plugins and themes and dropping all tables created by any plugins – still problems persisted.
It got to the point a couple of hours ago that I finally had enough and made liberal use of the Ctrl+A and Del keys
Pffzzzzzt – zap – gone – empty domain space. I’ll be nuking the database in a minute or two as well, then uploading from scratch and starting again in the morning (1:00am+ here now) after letting the dust in my head settle after spending the whole weekend scouring the WPMU and BP forums trying to resolve this.
I’ll also be starting with a WPMU install that has no periods in its directory and folder names – i.e. NO ” blogs.dir ” style of names – I am convinced that is a major source of some problems related to images, just as I am convinced that the user blog folder tree goes way to deep for Google search bots to follow it all the way to the bottom – and that’s gonna hurt SEO.
As I said up a bit, I’ve nuked the install (and the test installs) and will make a fresh start tomorrow … to mis-quote a famous movie line –
“I love the sight of deletion in the evenings” ~ Major Lee Pistoff, in aPressolypse Now
LOL
Gaz
September 26, 2009 at 5:04 pm #53116In reply to: BuddyPress Spam
wordpressfan
ParticipantI read your example. I need something with a wider net. First off, the robot registration never leave an e-mail address. Unlike WP comment spam, WPMU registration robots appear able to bypass required fields, including e-mail address.
I receive e-mails announcing new registrations that contain only IP addresses. Meaning I would need to include hundreds of IP addresses in your code.
The real solution is somehow create a bullet-proof required registration field or move the registration page behind a firewall. I’ve seen single-user WordPress installations that move the wp-admin or wp-signup pages to avoid robot attacks using the default name and location of these pages.
September 12, 2009 at 1:06 pm #52299In reply to: Fighting Splogs
danbpfr
Participanti don’t know if robots go directly into db, or use the wp code…
but one thing you can try is to hack a little the register_new_user function in wp-login.php
to ban some email domains like “XXXX@myspacee.info” witch massevely occurs in the past last weeks….
function begins at line 228 (v. 2.8.4a)
add this on line 233
$email_check = explode(“@”, $user_email);
insert also this at line 248
} elseif($email_check[1] == ‘myspacee.info’) {
$errors->add(‘invalid_email’, __(‘ERROR: The email address isn’t correct.’));
insert the same code and change the mail domain name if you need to ban more domains
In use with invisible-defender, wp-ban and wp-spamfree i think you would be quiet for a moment with unwanted registering of blogs or users.
June 23, 2009 at 2:38 am #47933In reply to: What are you doing for Spam
bbrian017
Participantis it complete? can we have an update? I’m cleaning my site often! The bots are bad!
May 23, 2009 at 4:08 am #45913Burt Adsit
ParticipantThe tables in the db don’t matter if the plugin that they belong to isn’t running. I guess I’m not understanding what the problem is. The site functions fine but you see errors about 404s and 500s in the log when bots come through looking for things that aren’t there?
If so then you’ll just have to wait until the bots index your current site properly. What’s the big deal? This isn’t a bp issue.
May 22, 2009 at 10:16 pm #45901Jeff Sayre
ParticipantOn another topic…is it good to create a ginormous robots.txt file? I’m wondering if that slows down your site at all.
I would place only what you need in your robots.txt file. The link I provide was just to show you that there are many, many bad bots out there. I would not implement the robots.txt file they recommend.
The fact hat yu are getting 500 instead of 404 error codes is a good clue. There must be some specific error showing up in Apache’s error log whenever that is fired. Please create the 500 error again, notice the exact time, and then check the log. What does it say?
Also, sometimes you can get a 500 error if directory or file permissions are not properly set. Where appropriate, they should be 755. Everything in /plugins/ that is BuddyPress specific should be set to 755.
A couple of additional questions while I’m at it:
- Have you searched the WPMU forums for 500 Internal Server Error thread? I think this may be more related to you WPMu install than BuddyPress?
- Are you using some special permalink structure? That should not be causing the lack of 404’s but every bit of info helps.
- Did you carefully follow the readme.txt file that comes with WPMU?
- Is this a new WPMU 2.7.1 install, or did you upgrade from an older version?
May 22, 2009 at 9:19 pm #45899Rich Spott
ParticipantThe offending party is usually Googlebot-images (but it has been others in the past).
I did what you said a disallowed googlebot-images with robots.txt, it seems to be working, but googlebot might only come through every 6-12 hours so can’t tell yet.
But even if that does work, I can easily recreate the error myself.
If I type in (which doesn’t exist):
http://sportsblognet.com/wp-content/mu-plugins/bp-core/images/mystery-man.jpg
I get a 500 Internal Server Error
If I type in (which doesn’t exist):
http://rotoassist.com/wp-content/mu-plugins/bp-core/images/mystery-man.jpg
It comes up as the proper 404 error
the rotoassist site is a regular WP 2.7.1 site on Site5 (one-click install type)
On another topic…is it good to create a ginormous robots.txt file? I’m wondering if that slows down your site at all.
And yes I use Firefox and have the Web Developer Add-on. The only info it gives me with the error though, is that it is a 500 internal error.
Another question…would you know anything about MySQL? Or do you know who I could talk to? I have some questions on our database and the speed of it.
Thanks for the constant help.
May 22, 2009 at 8:40 pm #45898Jeff Sayre
ParticipantRich-
Just a couple more thoughts while I think about your situation.
Have you determined the offending party that keeps triggering the redirects? Is it Googlebot-image? Have you disallowed it from searching your site with a robots.txt file?
If so, then it probably is not actually the Googlebot-image spider but a spam spider attempting to masquerade as the Google image bot. A robots.txt file cannot stop a spider from crawling your site. Reputable search engines honor the robots.txt file requests, unscrupulous ones ignore it.
For your information:
http://www.webmasterworld.com/search_engine_spiders/3204487.htm
http://perishablepress.com/press/2009/03/29/4g-ultimate-user-agent-blacklist/
Are you using Firefox? With Firefox and the Web Develoepr Add-on, you can get a lot of information about errors.
May 21, 2009 at 10:44 pm #45830Jeff Sayre
Participant301 Redirects:
http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?hl=en&answer=93633
http://www.seomoz.org/blog/url-rewrites-and-301-redirects-how-does-it-all-work
Using your robots.txt file to block googlebot-image from discovering your image files:
http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=35308
Make sure you block only the image directories that you do not want indexed.
Also, if you do not use Google’s Webmaster Tools, you may want to investigate. This service offers many tools, including a list of which files are throwing 404s. http://www.google.com/webmasters/tour/tour1.html
Do you mean while I get this situation worked out? Or do you mean that people are working on this because numerous people have been getting this issue?
I’m not sure that the word numerous applies as I’ve only seen a half dozen or fewer threads with this particular issue. Remember, one person’s 404 is not necessarily the same as the next persons.
This type of issue often comes down to one or more factors: bad install, using too old a version of WPMU or BP, plugin conflict, custom theme issue, apache issue, ISP limitations.
We can try helping you with most of these but do not have any control outside the core of the BuddyPress code. We investigate as best we can with the information provided and if it is caused by BuddyPress, offer a fix in trunk.
I see in another thread that you are on Slicehost. I’m with them as well. Since you have to set up your own slice, there may be an apache issue. So, to better understand you particular issue, please provide some more details:
- Have you tried deactivating all non-buddypress plugins, wp-super-cache in particular?
- Have you tried using the default .htaccess file that ships with WPMU?
- Are there any PHP errors in your log files?
- what are the other listed errors in your apache log?
May 21, 2009 at 8:08 pm #45824Jeff Sayre
ParticipantSo i traced the error to my access log and I found that these errors are being caused by some site requesting a file that no longer exists
While this issue is being worked out, you should either block the offending site(s) from attempting to accessing the non-existent files, or you should do a 301 redirect of the moved files–or at least the moved directories.
Furthermore, you can block the Googlebot-Image bot in your robots.txt file. Although the image bot should not be causing the issue since it is just searching your site gathering information. It is not requesting files, it is discovering them.
May 1, 2009 at 2:21 am #43963In reply to: Future of E-mail… mynickname@mysocialnetwork.com
Anointed
ParticipantA number of years ago I offered email to my users and in the end there were thousands of people using my servers for email, including spam bots.
Here is the biggest problem that I faced.
As there was so much ‘spam’ coming from my domains, I was blacklisted on aol, and yahoo, and a few others. To this day, I still cannot use those domains to send email to aol etc…. Once blacklisted, it seems to be forever.
While I think the idea is cool, I cannot see a reason that I would ever offer email to my users other than my admins/moderators for internal communication.
just my 2cents
April 27, 2009 at 10:54 pm #43748In reply to: What are you doing for Spam
cdaniel
ParticipantI had a problem with spam without reCaptcha
reCaptcha kills spam bots and I have no more spam.
Good luck
April 27, 2009 at 10:14 pm #43747In reply to: What are you doing for Spam
Anointed
ParticipantI had an idea of another way to combat the constant comment spam and registrations from bots, though I don\’t know if it would work.
As the bots don\’t read the page like humans do, they just search for and find the forums to fill in, brings up an interesting idea.
What about using \’hidden\’ fields that are not displayed on the screen itself.
The idea being that if data is input into the field it could not possibly be a human, so we then know to \’not activate\’ or error out the comment/registration etc…
The ‘auto spam bot programs’ that I have come across all look for specific fields etc. We could do something like name the hidden field ‘password’ etc, so the bot thinks it’s legit, but it’s not.
Does anyone know if the bots are \’smart enough\’ to figure this out and get around it?
April 27, 2009 at 2:39 pm #43700In reply to: Securing components from non logged in users
thebigk
ParticipantAhoy!
Do I need to make any changes to make Burt\’s mod work on RC2 ?
And…will this prevent the search engine bots from grabbing member profile information?
April 13, 2009 at 2:24 pm #42545Deep
Participant@Jeff Sayre – Will it be safe to have latest SVN version on production site? I am not sure about it so asking..
For now, I am going to export the online DB to my local machine and see if it makes a difference or not.. (if the tables are not automatically getting created that means, the issue is with the spam bots else the issue is with something else)
I will post updates in a while..
February 9, 2009 at 10:32 pm #37588In reply to: Forum Integration: HELPING HINTS
oldskoo1
ParticipantThanks for this guide, very helpful!
I was trying to get this working myself before i found this.
2 things that were a must for me…
Alpha version on bbpress was the only version that worked
Don’t touch the cookie integration, skip that bit and just do the DB integration.
Oh and there is a problem with duplicate content if you care about google spidering it if users find the default forum and link to it.
There just add a robots.txt file with
User-agent: *
Disallow: /bbpress/
You could probably put a header redirect on it too to stop people using it and only using the bp side.
-
AuthorSearch Results