Skip to:
Content
Pages
Categories
Search
Top
Bottom

Search Results for 'spam'

Viewing 25 results - 2,251 through 2,275 (of 2,597 total)
  • Author
    Search Results
  • #61885
    Andy Peatling
    Keymaster

    A good idea is to change the signup slug to something else. This will help significantly. Also, if you don’t need to provide blog registrations, then turn this option off.

    The problem with bundling a solution in the core is spammers will eventually get around this and it will become useless. The best way to fight spam is to have something unique on your site that stops them in their tracks. A completely unique signup slug is a good way of doing this.

    #61881
    guristu
    Participant

    I will but I would like to take a little more time to see if it works. So far it looks like it does. However I have not tried on bp 1.2. Gotta install that first and see how it goes there.

    #61878
    Michael Berra
    Participant

    @guristu: WOW – that sounds very promising, I always found the hashcash-plugin a very good and simple solution. Why not sending your “hack” to the developers, so that they can update their plugin-version for all the future bp-users :-)

    #61876
    guristu
    Participant

    I have adjusted the wp-hashcash plugin to work with buddypress signup. Here is what I did: I got the wp-hashcash plugin and I added the following code to the file:

    Code:
    function wphc_check_signup_for_bp(){

    global $bp;

    // get our options
    $options = wphc_option();
    $spam = false;
    //if( !strpos( $_SERVER[ ‘PHP_SELF’ ], ‘wp-signup.php’ ) )
    //return $result;

    // Check the wphc values against the last five keys
    $spam = !in_array($_POST[“wphc_value”], $options[‘key’]);

    if($spam){
    $options[‘signups-spam’] = ((int) $options[‘signups-spam’]) + 1;
    wphc_option($options);
    $bp->signup->errors[‘spam’] = __(‘You did not pass a spam check. Please enable JavaScript in your browser.’);
    } else {
    $options[‘signups-ham’] = ((int) $options[‘signups-ham’]) + 1;
    wphc_option($options);
    }

    }
    add_action( ‘bp_signup_validate’, ‘wphc_check_signup_for_bp’);

    function wphc_error_hook_register_page(){

    do_action(‘bp_spam_errors’);

    }
    add_action(‘bp_before_register_page’, ‘wphc_error_hook_register_page’);

    Then, under the line (line number about 507)

    Code:
    add_action( ‘signup_hidden_fields’, ‘wphc_add_signupform’ );

    I put this line:

    Code:
    add_action(‘bp_after_registration_submit_buttons’, ‘wphc_add_signupform’);

    Then I activate the plugin. It should keep spam bots from being able to create accounts, but humans spammers can still do it. Anyway, if you can’t get it to work, let me know via PM and I will try to send you the file.

    Later

    #61875
    peterverkooijen
    Participant

    I never had spam on my main site, until now. The invisible-defender plugin doesn’t help at all and clashes with Beau Lebens’s wp-email-login plugin. Haven’t had time to try any of the other solutions yet. It’s now after midnight, deadlines tomorrow, wasting time deleting spam accounts…

    #61874
    zageek
    Participant

    I am having major problems with spam as well. Ironically it started as soon as I put my link in the showcase thread on this forum. I think the spam bots are looking there for easy targets as well.

    Why do people make spambots that don’t even advertise stuff and just waste everyone’s time filling sites with meaningless crap. Is it like they are trying to sabotage Buddypress?

    How does one submit domains and sites and IP addresses to spam traps.

    #61850
    danbpfr
    Participant

    http://www.bp-tricks.com/tips_and_tricks/stopping-the-sploggers/

    i guess this is one of the best trick against spam blogs and “wild” registrations.

    Step 1 and 2 are a bit obvious, but 3 and 4 are really efficient.

    Keep in mind that on a wpmu site each blog created by a member has his first post and comment appearing on the default template – the good ol’ kakumei… on which is also written “powered by…” ( Step 2 is only for main blog i think) Spam bots eat this with delectation i suppose. :-)

    Spam programs are written to bypass signup. Well. I presume other narrow words like join, fall in, get together are also activ in such programms. But what do these programms if you choose “groink” or “methabolic” ? So follow the explanation and choose a really original word for your signup redirection. This works well for the moment. And don’t forget to put the functions.php file the in mu-plugins folder (to be theme independant).

    To use in addition with some other solutions (wp-ban, invisible defender, …) of course.

    #61841
    peterverkooijen
    Participant

    Crap, the spammers have now found my site. :-(

    These are not the spammers with name+year usernames, like ‘johndoe1973’, that I used to get on test sites. Those seemed to bypass the registration and activation process, because they didn’t show up on my mailing list.

    The spammers I get now have realistic sounding full names and apparently usernames generated from those fullnames (my regular custom registration). I recognize them from the long random strings they add in my custom Company field.

    Haven’t seen them registering blogs yet. What are they even trying to achieve?!

    Sploggers is a serious problem that WPMU/BPAutomattic needs to address!

    #61821

    In reply to: Mark as spammer option

    bbrian017
    Participant

    oh yes sorry I meant for this option to be on the members blog page. Normally I could see the users profile in the admin bar and it linked me to his or her profile page to mark as a spammer.

    With this template I have to manually find out who the members of that blog is.

    Is anyone following what I’m saying?

    sorry for the confusion.

    #61717
    Paul Wong-Gibbs
    Keymaster

    BuddyPress uses regular WP Mail functions. Perhaps they’re getting caught as spam.

    #61712
    Paul Wong-Gibbs
    Keymaster

    Checking your referral logs is one way you can see how they’re getting in. Tip: login to the bbpress admin area and CLOSE SIGNUPS.

    Obviously this only applies if you are running a seperate bbPress install.

    #61705
    amirk011
    Participant

    Hey Buddypess, do something to stop spammers at your earliest. They waste our resources drastically!!!!!!!!

    #61702
    amirk011
    Participant

    Andrea, I did it but all in vain. I guess buddypress should talk with wp-recaptcha or akismat developers and come up with built-in akismat or captcha support for buddypress sign up pages.

    And there’s no benefit of banning email domains or ip since every time they come up with new fake domains and ip address. There should be a permanent solution… “Spbloggers” is the biggest problem for those who use buddypress.

    #61696
    Andrea Rennick
    Participant

    One thing to remember, the spammers can see the signup code. That’s what they build their scripts for.

    The better you can customize your site, the better you can stop them.

    Checking your referral logs is one way you can see how they’re getting in. Tip: login to the bbpress admin area and CLOSE SIGNUPS.

    #61685
    Tracedef
    Participant

    Do follow is also a great way to encourage users to create and fill out a profile, specifically if you create custom fields for their “websites” in their profile. Spam registrations are already a major issue ( at least for us ) so that isn’t much of a deterrent for us at least.

    #61683
    Tracedef
    Participant

    I’m in the same boat. Have used a bunch of different captchas including the recaptcha that has been reworked for BuddyPress to no avail. Even took down our registration page for a day to make sure spammers weren’t bypassing via bbpress or somewhere else…. it was nice not having to delete spam accounts for a day. :) We may end up taking buddypress out at some point here until there are better spam tools in place.

    #61677
    Andrea Rennick
    Participant

    I know on the MU side, you can ban registrations from specified email domains. (Site Admin -> Options)

    Can’t remember if this translates over to the BP side.

    #61633
    peterverkooijen
    Participant

    There was a new blunt solution here. Apparently having a couple of required custom profile fields also cuts down spam.

    #61632
    ozpoker
    Participant

    I was just about to ask the same thing – never had much trouble before when using re-captcha but now I have upgraded we’re talking 20-30/day and increasing

    Which brings me to my next question – is it better to mark both user and blog as spammer or just delete them both?

    #61587
    bpisimone
    Participant

    Good thought about the reputation. YOu might be able to combine it with the achievments plugin! In any case let us know if you attempt anything like that.

    #61481
    Alex
    Participant

    @mike: Even with just a small site. I was running it on first with a VPS hosted site and it got shut down by the provider. They say that the “huge” amount of mail coming from BP notifications are “spam” and a violation of their TOS since, they say, it got the IP blacklisted.

    I moved it to a dedicated server but I’m concerned that the IP address will be blacklisted if the system sends out hundreds of mail notifications in an hour. Problem is, I don’t know how much mail is too much. And if that should qualify as spamming. :) Should this be a concern?

    Was just wondering if there’s a way for the admin to set email notifications off by default. Or if not, if there’s a code we can edit to do that. :) Feedback would be great.

    #61450

    In reply to: Email Server

    gpo1
    Participant

    Your Bp email server might become an open relay server for spammers !

    #61382
    bbrian017
    Participant

    The only reason I noticed this is because the comment love keeps messing up and I have to go in and re enter the url under the admin profile.

    p.s linking my site in this forum has only brought me spam.

    It seems to be staying now…

    jivany
    Participant

    Raise a ticket. This is a usability/privacy issue. It should be blatantly obvious to the user who is replying to a private message that they are sending to more than the sender.

    thomasbp
    Participant

    Thx, I got it, but my users won’t, since they see a PM rather as an email and not as another kind of a discussion group (core age 15, so they have plenty of time to enter all the names :) ). It’s also in my opinion not intuitive.

    If there is no simple way to include a “no bcc” option – is there a way to limit the number of recipients to one user?

Viewing 25 results - 2,251 through 2,275 (of 2,597 total)
Skip to toolbar