Search Results for 'wordpress'
-
AuthorSearch Results
-
February 11, 2010 at 4:27 am #63072
In reply to: Convert a WordPress Theme to a BuddyPress Theme
Reezo
ParticipantI think you can do it the same way as upgrading theme from 1.0 to 1.1..
https://codex.buddypress.org/how-to-guides/upgrading-a-buddypress-1-0-theme-for-buddypress-1-1/
February 11, 2010 at 2:08 am #63066In reply to: Convert a WordPress Theme to a BuddyPress Theme
Scotm
ParticipantSo anyone have a general guide to converting an existing WP theme to work with BP 1.2?
Thx
February 11, 2010 at 12:17 am #63057In reply to: mo file uploading broke my 1.2
danbpfr
ParticipantI continued my investigation and find some interresting things on the german WP forum
about the 2.8 version and 64bit server php bug due to gettext.
http://forum.wordpress-deutschland.org/installation/55589-und-noch-einmal-out-memory-4.html
Also from germany this post in english:
http://alexrabe.de/2009/06/14/dear-hoster-we-need-more-memory/
from the author of memory_overview plugin
And a begin of solution, a modified mo.php file, from here:
http://www.code-styling.de/deutsch/wordpress-28-sprachdatei-speicherverbrauch-minimieren (the link to the mo file is in yellow under the title “Historie des Downloads” )
This file goes into wp_includes/pomo
Use memory_overview plugin, go to the dashboard to view the difference.
Since 2.5, WP give the possibility to increase php memory in wp-config, but this didn’t work for me.
https://codex.wordpress.org/Editing_wp-config.php#Increasing_memory_allocated_to_PHP
February 10, 2010 at 11:57 pm #63052In reply to: Downgrade WordPress MU to a standard WordPress?
danbpfr
ParticipantAnoying for you, but the backend is exactly the same, except the BP menu
February 10, 2010 at 11:56 pm #63051In reply to: Downgrade WordPress MU to a standard WordPress?
Jean-Pierre Michaud
Participantinstead of downgrading, i would suggest you wait the next version of wordpress in 2 or 3 months, where both wpmu and wordpress are merged seamlessly… right now, you have no real possibility to make it go independant or you play with the database…
February 10, 2010 at 11:13 pm #63049In reply to: Advanced Search, is it possible??
r-a-y
KeymasterI believe the plugin is called BP Member Filter:
February 10, 2010 at 8:19 pm #63018In reply to: GPL Question re upcoming plugin release
Jeff Sayre
ParticipantYou will have to license your work under some version of the GPL that at minimum offers the freedoms that the WP GPL offers.
What others have said above is basically correct. The GPL does not say anything about free as in cost. It is about freedoms of the end user. In fact, the GPL does not discourage developers or theme designers from making money off of their work or someone else’s work.
However, the GPL is very specific in how this is to be done: either by charging a distribution fee, a support fee, or both. So, in effect, you are not charging for the code itself. The vast majority of Premium plugin shops simply charge a distribution and support fee. If their plugins are not GPLed, then something is wrong.
Here are two great links from the GNU website that explain this very clearly:
By the way, IMO there should not be a double standard in the WordPress community. Premium theme designers abound. Premium plugin developers should also be afforded the same respect and opportunity. The crucial point is that their work, like premium themes, must remain licensed under the GPL.
Of course, as Matt Mullenweg has stated on numerous occasions when discussing the issue of premium themes, although the PHP must be GPLed, the CSS and JS of the theme can be copyrighted. The same holds true with plugins. But, in my opinion, doing so is just too picky. I prefer to GPL everything–the PHP, CSS, JS, etc.
Now, you could choose to license your work under the AGPL, which is considered to offer more freedoms to the community. The basic difference from the GPL is that any changes made to your plugin, even if for private use, must be returned back to the community. Under GPLv1 through GPLv3, it is acceptable for any code changes to a plugin to remain private if the plugin is never distributed.
One final thought. I’ve stated this before in other places. Many people in the WordPress community seem to be moving beyond the spirit of the GPL, to a more utopian, share and share alike vision. There’s nothing wrong with that if it happens. But the GPL has never been about free as in cost.
February 10, 2010 at 8:16 pm #63016In reply to: Disabling Groups, using global bbPress forum anyway
r-a-y
KeymasterThis tutorial worked for me:
http://theeasybutton.com/blog/2009/07/17/integrating-buddypress-wordpress-mu-and-bbpress/
It’s a little old, but the basic premise is the same.
February 10, 2010 at 6:48 pm #62995In reply to: GPL Question re upcoming plugin release
@mercime
ParticipantHi DCartwright. I would say that the GPL even allows anyone to take WordPress core and release an ‘improved’ version and charge for it as long as it’s released under GPL as well. You know that the WP plugin repo requires GPL, but whatever you decide, you’ve got my 1pence or more
February 10, 2010 at 5:16 pm #62983In reply to: GPL Question re upcoming plugin release
Anonymous User 96400
InactiveGPL has nothing to do with code being free (as in beer). Anyone can take code published under the GPL (WordPress for example) and start charging for it as long as all necessary conditions are met.
February 10, 2010 at 4:17 pm #62970Greg
ParticipantDid you find what the problem was in the child theme? I am having the EXACT same issue, with the ghost 1969 group creation and everything. In group creation, everything seems to work just fine until the upload avatar page, where the form doesn’t show up.
The only files I have customized are the header and footer templates, and they should have all the important WordPress/Buddypress snippets necessary. Is there something in particular I should be looking for?
February 10, 2010 at 2:33 pm #62961Dwenaus
ParticipantThanks for the comment David. I agree for a very robust solution a custom taxonomy would fit the bill. However a bare bones implementation might just use the group meta table.
I checked out this older plugin: BuddyPress Contents (https://wordpress.org/extend/plugins/bpcontents/installation/) which has serious tag and category support however it is no longer in development. But maybe i’ll dig in the code and see how he implemented it and try to salvage the parts i need.
February 10, 2010 at 10:42 am #62946In reply to: wp_content disappeared during 2.9.1.1 + 1.2 upgrade
Windhamdavid
ParticipantHa Ha ~ twas caused by a plugin ~ props @Bowe
http://hungred.com/how-to/avoid-trouble-filter-thecontent-wordpress/
February 10, 2010 at 8:50 am #62941In reply to: BuddyPress Links 0.3-beta released for testing
Anton
Participantanother thing…when you create a new link it shows that you have created the link so many hours ago but it takes the server time so all my links that I create is 4 hours in the past. Is there a workaround to this so that it takes the time setting you have setup in the settings of the wordpress MU settings page?
February 10, 2010 at 12:20 am #62923In reply to: BuddyPress Links 0.3-beta released for testing
MrMaz
ParticipantThere is a lot of pressure from the top of the food chain to move past classic theme. This is evident in the fact that classic theme will not even ship with 1.2 and has been relegated to the backwards compatibility plugin.
Thanks for reporting that feed link bug, I have fixed it in trunk. I am not following what you mean regarding the comments issue.
Auto-embedding refers to embedding content from the URL that is submitted. There is no support for automatic adding of all of a user’s content from a remote service.
@David Angel
Awesome! Are you running WP single or MU?
One other person has reported a similar problem, I am looking into it. Do you have BP installed in a sub directory of the document root by any chance?
This beta seems to be broken for quite a few people. However, geoffm33 has it working at 95% on a single WP install, and David Angel has it running as well, so there is probably some kind of install-specific issue that needs to be worked out. I will do my best to get to the bottom of it and put out another beta ASAP.
In the meantime, you might want to try the development version which I have updated today with some fixes that might work for some of you that are having problems. It also might make things worse, so have courage!
February 9, 2010 at 11:28 pm #62921In reply to: mo file uploading broke my 1.2
danbpfr
Participant@erich73, na Bueb, das’is n’Gstanzel ! Net von Dir !
@DJ, did you read my post ? I expected the same problem with a standard install…
So it remains the problem of memory.
My host give the possibility to install automatically CMS’s like joomla, wordpress or wpmu, drupal etc to his customers on any of his shared offers. From the cheapest to the most expensive !
Do you really think he would do that if these tools can’t work because of an unapropriate memory appetite ?
So what is the minimal size to rent on a shared host to have an operating install with the actual and next coming version ?
And please, don’t tell me i have to go to wordpress.com
February 9, 2010 at 10:54 pm #62916In reply to: mo file uploading broke my 1.2
Paul Wong-Gibbs
KeymasterWell, it might. All those strings you translate get put into memory at run-time. 20Mb is extremely small for a WordPress/BuddyPress site especially if on a shared server.
Plus, BuddyPress isn’t supported on WordPress 3.0-alpha because, obviously, it’s in alpha. WordPress 3.0-alpha might have huge memory leaks which could be giving you this problem. I would urge you to stick to WP or WPMU 2.9.* for now
February 9, 2010 at 8:51 pm #62896In reply to: Characters in usernames cause strange issues
zooney
ParticipantHrrm… That’s interesting, but the thing about my issue is that I would like to default to user_login and not user_nicename (user_nicename is causing the problem).
From your fix, I’d simply have to imagine that it should already be doing what I want, but it doesn’t. It attempts to always put in user_nicename.
It’s very confusing. It’s also very disappointing. BuddyPress seemed to have promise for a few applications at my university, but I’m not going to be able to use it effectively without being able to use usernames that essentially look like emails (they would be Shibboleth eppns).
I don’t get it, why is BuddyPress such a pain about usernames? If BuddyPress is a WordPress Mu plugin, it should work with any username that is valid in WordPress… I can only assume this is some kind of bug within BuddyPress itself, and I’ll continue treating it as such.
February 9, 2010 at 7:37 pm #62886In reply to: Facebook-Like-Chat Plugin for Buddypress?
r-a-y
KeymasterThese are all that I’m aware of:
Cometchat is working on a BuddyPress integration with friends support. It’s a paid script.
Bowob Chat works, but does not have a friend feature, also you might get the plugin author’s ads on your site. Free (w/ ads).
https://wordpress.org/extend/plugins/bowob/
Footerchat is another possibility, again, it has no friends support and you will get some ads occasionally. Free (w/ ads).
Webbychat is another. Has a basic free option, which only supports up to 10 users. Variable paid options are available. You’ll have to manually configure the script to work with BP.
February 9, 2010 at 6:21 pm #62880In reply to: cannot active buddypress plugin
mdl86
Participantwordpress mu 2.9.1
buddypress 1.1.3
February 9, 2010 at 6:12 pm #62877In reply to: cannot active buddypress plugin
Windhamdavid
Participanthttps://buddypress.org/forums/topic/help-us-help-you
what flavor wordpress and what setup on your server?
February 9, 2010 at 1:45 pm #62846In reply to: BuddyPress for dummies book
fastfido
ParticipantThat’s cool someone took the time to write a book on Buddypress. Unfortunately there is the lag time with printing paper. I like the model used by the guys who did “Digging into WordPress”.
You can get a print copy but you also get a digital download with a lifetime (what ever that will mean) of updates. What ever the vehicle for the PDF book is that they used I don’t know but it is good and easy to use. I really like having it and look to it before Googling an answer (time suck).
February 9, 2010 at 7:26 am #62824In reply to: Generating a fatal error
Paul Wong-Gibbs
KeymasterFor regular WordPress, you need at a minimum BP 1.2-RC2. 1.1.3 doesn’t work with regular WordPress, only the MU version
February 9, 2010 at 6:02 am #62818In reply to: Brand new install of 1.2 with wpmu 2.9.1
frenzi
Participantthis is too happening with me if u just remove the buddypress plugin then wordpress is works fine
February 9, 2010 at 5:57 am #62817In reply to: Generating a fatal error
frenzi
Participantmy url is http://frenzi.in/blog where my wordpress (2.9.1) blog is located i was advised that to install buddy press 1.1.3
-
AuthorSearch Results