@derekbolden
when you create a Blog as a user, then you are being send into the WPMU-Dashboard-interface.
At least at my installation…….is it different at yours ?
Change it to 777 and see if it works, if it doesn’t at least your sure it isn’t your permissions.
After that see what the plugin might have altered, it could have changed a path in your buddypress.
(I presume you did deactivate it after getting the error)
http://www.rackspace.nl/content/images_za/ppc_landing_pages/virtualisation.gif
VPS is not the same as dedicated even though it’s close.
Not sure how many visitors you get per day, but on my home install (this pc) I got 100 visitors at a certain moment on my buddypress driven site and it didn’t even went over 10% (that while running a lot of other crap, like firefox and photoshop).
Setup: 3.07 GHz (i7 950) and 6 GB Ram.
Why not try running a simple script (maybe GD or something) outside of wordpress and see if you get 100% CPU, if it doesn’t, then accuse wordpress.
@DJPaul writing a check now! LOL
Downloading and testing plug in 
oh and this statement:
“I think BuddyPress will be different things to different people… including the developers”
Is very true as bp is a a plug in architecture
I hear ya I was testing to see if it would only be theming issues but I think there are others. I’m finding that most of the bp plugins will have to be completely re-written to accommodate the current trunk. 
A suggestion for this plug in is to make it similar to the way you add content to the activity streams on facebook.
The new default bp theme is very micro-blog / facebook feed and could use some media post capabilities.
@PH
Can you post a screenshot of the site? It looks fine in FF. There have been some reports of Safari bugs, but nobody has been kind enough to submit a fix/patch yet.
File server permissions are kind of beyond the scope of support for this particular plugin. The files are set up to be created in the standard WPMU directory, the same as the core BP components. In your case the directory /httpdocs/wp-content/blogs.dir/1/files/link-avatars needs to be writable by the web server. You would probably have better luck opening up a support ticket with your hosting company.
@Modem
Thanks for taking the time to test and post feedback.
I have not worked on BP 1.2 support yet. They are saying that it will probably be late January before 1.2 is officially released, so I don’t want to try to support it yet when a lot could change between now and then.
I am getting a lot of requests to support 1.2 “now” but all I can say is that 1.2 is bleeding edge right now, and I don’t plan to ever support bleeding edge versions of BP. Once it is closer to release I will start working on support.
In ur themes function.php (create one if it doesn’t exist in ur theme folder) add
<br />
/* Register an additional fourth widget column */<br />
register_sidebars( 1,<br />
array(<br />
'name' => 'fourth-section',<br />
'before_widget' => '<div id="%1$s" class="widget %2$s">',<br />
'after_widget' => '</div>',<br />
'before_title' => '<h2 class="widgettitle">',<br />
'after_title' => '</h2>'<br />
)<br />
);<br />
and alter the code in ur post above to
<div id="fourth-section" class="widget-section"><br />
<?php if ( !function_exists('dynamic_sidebar')<br />
|| !dynamic_sidebar('fourth-section') ) : ?></p>
<p> <div class="widget-error"><br />
<?php _e( 'Please log in and add widgets to this section.', 'buddypress' ) ?> /wp-admin/widgets.php?s=&show=&sidebar=first-section"><?php _e( 'Add Widgets', 'buddypress' ) ?><br />
</div></p>
<p> <?php endif; ?></p>
<p> </div>
This should bring u a functional fourth-section sidebar in the wordpress backend. Valid for BP 1.1.3 Theme.
This plug in completely breaks in new theme not just the layout, it doesn’t show videos at all just the link.
Works fine in older theme.
Crap.. now all file permissions are BORKED!
I cant upload any file:
1) Via Media Library (Add New) *stopped working
2) Via the Avatar upload image of Buddpress Link area * Doesnt work
3) Via creating a new post.
/BLOGS.DIR/ is owned by APACHE in the APACHE group with these permissions rwx r-x r-x
*cough* Yours for a billion squillion dollars.
This is one of the best threads I have read this week. I have no time left this evening to share my thoughts fully, but in a nutshell, I think for a quick blog post option in the BuddyPress (frontend? UI?) — *not* just the home blog theme, like P2 — makes sense. I think it would be worth exploring the idea in this discussion.
As such, I spent the evening throwing together a plugin that adds a ‘New Blog Post’ link underneath a user’s “Blogs” menu. You can get the alpha 0.1 release from http://djpaul.dangerous-minds.net/postcard.zip (it’s called “Postcard’).
As its an alpha and I’ve only spent about 3 hours on it so far, the form doesn’t do anything yet, but I’d like some feedback on what people think. I’ll probably end up releasing it as a plugin anyway.
Interesting thread.
Has anybody been on FB lately? All the content is micro posts via activity streams and the new default theme mimics this activity. The only thing that I see should be added to that flow is the opportunity to add media to a micro post from the front end of bp.
Somebody make that plugin and i’ll buy it TODAY!
Nobody is blogging as much anymore as the twitter-fication of the web has taken over. The new web is micro-post reply, micro-post reply rinse repeat.
I think BuddyPress will be different things to different people… including the developers.
Follow up question
@MrMaz
Am I suppose to create a directory inside WP-CONTENT/BLOGS.DIR/1/FILES/
and is that directory suppose to be called /LINK-AVATARS/
****
Im getting an error when uploading an avatar.
Upload Failed! Error was: Unable to create directory /httpdocs/wp-content/blogs.dir/1/files/link-avatars/3. Is its parent directory writable by the server?
@MrMaz
on my site.. http://porscheheritage.com the links are displayed not in a list..
What are we talking about here guys? Only the blog creators will ever see the dashboard on a regular basis. All the users that are subscribers will rarely if ever see it.
True. But there are a few cases where regular users are sent into the backend. In the first version of my site I had to hack core files to bring them into the regular layout and use plugins to close parts of the backend for users with blogs. I’m now in the middle of upgrading to 1.1.3, a painful process…
The question is how Buddypress will develop into the future, as more features are added. I’m also running into the issue how to structure user interface for new functionality here – haven’t had time to work on that yet. Boone Gorges gives a good suggestion how to bring adding an RSS feed into the front end.
I’m sticking with Buddypress because I believe it has the most potential for the reasons I pointed out earlier and because I assume(d) that it will become more mature over time. But if the developer community sees Buddypress as just “an add-on to a blogging/CMS platform” aimed at communities of experienced bloggers, that would be a problem for me.
What are we talking about here guys? Only the blog creators will ever see the dashboard on a regular basis. All the users that are subscribers will rarely if ever see it. Create a subscriber account for yourself and check that for yourself. I think you all are being too demanding on software that is so young. BuddyPress as an add on to a blogging/CMS platform is what I want, not the other way around. If we go that route what are going to end up with? Gifts?
I think you all might want to check out some of those other software suites I mentioned previously (out of that bunch I really like Social Engine).
BTW the thought of gifts makes me vomit just a little…
– BuddyPress is great !
– Creating Blogs with WPMU is great !
– the WP-platform is great !
Just giving the “WPMU-Dashboard” the SAME design and user-interface as we have at the current BuddyPress-default-theme, in order to make the full website look coherent.
That is the ONLY missing piece in the puzzle, at least for me.
I do see the potential. As I said earlier in this thread:
That’s why I believe Buddypress has a lot of potential. It’s a social network, but with a strong content publishing angle.
I’m absolutely not advocating copying Facebook etc. I’m a big believer in the idea of “private social networks”. And I actually think that adding old-fashioned forums dilutes the blog logic that should be Buddypress’ main strength.
Groups has enormous potential and seems to be pretty unique.
But imagine Buddypress being used by schools, companies, trade associations, sports clubs, etc. That is a very different audience from the experienced WordPress bloggers in the Buddypress development community.
I think that Bloggus, Peterverkooijen, and others are not seeing the potential. I looked REALLY hard at SocialEngine, JomSocial, and a few others (follow me @crankyderek for my complete list) in the end i came back to BuddyPress BECAUSE of the fact that the users that wanted to blog could create their own dynamic blogs! Why build a community that offers more or less the same functionality of Facebook or Myspace? Odds are most of your users are there already. Do you really think you are going to get a daily (Hell hourly if they play one of those Zygna games) Facebook user to come visit your site with the same frequency when all your community offers is duplicate functionality, copycat features and NONE or few of their friends… Don’t you see it’s the things that make BuddyPress different that will make it succeed.
Interesting, so is there a way to have the forums set up like they are here? I do not see any group forums here.
Erich73;
well honestly, I have then no idea why you use BP if you are using is only as Discussion-Forum with Groups.
I see BP as a plugin for WPMU and nothing else. If I want only a social platform, without the extensive WP blogs, then I would never go for BP. There are many other great softwares out there. (not that BP is bad ) For me blogs are the central point and the backbone of the system. Therefore I don’t understand the meaning of two backends.
“Remember, wordpress.tv has a TON of tutorial videos for beginners as well.”
…. not sure my german-language-speaking users at the age of 50 and over, are going to watch a video in order to understand how my website works
Once you need a video to EXPLAIN how a website works, something is wrong.
I just think that the “WPMU-Dashboard-backend” is not a place I want my users to go into, so I had to dis-able the feature for users to be able to create their own blog. So my website is more like a Discussion-Forum with Groups
I guess giving the “WPMU-DashBoard-backend” the same DESIGN as we do have at testbp.org (default-theme) would solve the issue.
Anybody out there who is able to do this ? Maybe a plug-in ?
Please do not take this as an offense, I really do love BuddyPress very much and highly appreciate the work of Andy & team & the community
I don’t think site wide activity would work if you’re using a fresh, external install of bbPress.
That would need to be coded probably as a bbPress plugin. I highly recommend deep integration between WPMU and bbPress so you can gain access to WP’s function within bbPress. Otherwise, you need to do specific calls to the database.
If you’re going with the latter approach, for hints, look into how Boone Gorges coded the MediaWiki plugin, which also writes to the sitewide activity stream.
Wow, what a response, even if not everybody got my point.
For me personally, I would like to use only the dashboard and have BP plugins forms be located there and not having a special interface for the information. I have nothing against the dashboard backend and people get into it very fast.
In that case everything would be in the same place, now it is divided. Even if BP is a plugin, there is no reason to have two “backends” for users, like it is now.
[blockquote]
Quick posting from the front end is on the Roadmap.
[/blockquote]
That is for me totally not interesting, since this means splitting the input forms even more form the “two backends”.
Quick posting from the front end is on the Roadmap. They can’t give us everything we want immediately
I agree that having two interfaces is confusing for people who are use to things like Facebook. But as I say, the Dashboard isn’t likely to be overhauled anytime soon because a) it doesn’t need to be and b) it was just done earlier this year. Total overhaul.
But the Dashboard is a Blogging / CMS interface. For what it is, it’s world-class. In my opinion. But it’s not a social networking style interface where everything is done inline on the front end. No, that’s not ideal. I completely agree. But the alternatives have their own issues. So the choice of which open source software to use is really up to the individual.
