Search Results for 'buddypress'
-
AuthorSearch Results
-
December 22, 2009 at 10:32 pm #59342
In reply to: BuddyPress Links 0.2-RC1 now available
PH (porsche)
ParticipantCrap.. now all file permissions are BORKED!
I cant upload any file:
1) Via Media Library (Add New) *stopped working
2) Via the Avatar upload image of Buddpress Link area * Doesnt work
3) Via creating a new post.
/BLOGS.DIR/ is owned by APACHE in the APACHE group with these permissions rwx r-x r-x
December 22, 2009 at 10:31 pm #59341In reply to: Is BuddyPress confusing to users?
Paul Wong-Gibbs
Keymaster*cough* Yours for a billion squillion dollars.
This is one of the best threads I have read this week. I have no time left this evening to share my thoughts fully, but in a nutshell, I think for a quick blog post option in the BuddyPress (frontend? UI?) — *not* just the home blog theme, like P2 — makes sense. I think it would be worth exploring the idea in this discussion.
As such, I spent the evening throwing together a plugin that adds a ‘New Blog Post’ link underneath a user’s “Blogs” menu. You can get the alpha 0.1 release from http://djpaul.dangerous-minds.net/postcard.zip (it’s called “Postcard’).
As its an alpha and I’ve only spent about 3 hours on it so far, the form doesn’t do anything yet, but I’d like some feedback on what people think. I’ll probably end up releasing it as a plugin anyway.
December 22, 2009 at 10:22 pm #59340In reply to: Is BuddyPress confusing to users?
modemlooper
ModeratorInteresting thread.
Has anybody been on FB lately? All the content is micro posts via activity streams and the new default theme mimics this activity. The only thing that I see should be added to that flow is the opportunity to add media to a micro post from the front end of bp.
Somebody make that plugin and i’ll buy it TODAY!
Nobody is blogging as much anymore as the twitter-fication of the web has taken over. The new web is micro-post reply, micro-post reply rinse repeat.
December 22, 2009 at 8:57 pm #59339In reply to: Is BuddyPress confusing to users?
David Lewis
ParticipantI think BuddyPress will be different things to different people… including the developers.
December 22, 2009 at 8:54 pm #59338In reply to: BuddyPress Links 0.2-RC1 now available
PH (porsche)
ParticipantFollow up question
Am I suppose to create a directory inside WP-CONTENT/BLOGS.DIR/1/FILES/
and is that directory suppose to be called /LINK-AVATARS/
****
Im getting an error when uploading an avatar.
Upload Failed! Error was: Unable to create directory /httpdocs/wp-content/blogs.dir/1/files/link-avatars/3. Is its parent directory writable by the server?
December 22, 2009 at 8:25 pm #59337In reply to: BuddyPress Links 0.2-RC1 now available
PH (porsche)
Participanton my site.. http://porscheheritage.com the links are displayed not in a list..
December 22, 2009 at 8:20 pm #59336In reply to: Is BuddyPress confusing to users?
peterverkooijen
ParticipantWhat are we talking about here guys? Only the blog creators will ever see the dashboard on a regular basis. All the users that are subscribers will rarely if ever see it.
True. But there are a few cases where regular users are sent into the backend. In the first version of my site I had to hack core files to bring them into the regular layout and use plugins to close parts of the backend for users with blogs. I’m now in the middle of upgrading to 1.1.3, a painful process…
The question is how Buddypress will develop into the future, as more features are added. I’m also running into the issue how to structure user interface for new functionality here – haven’t had time to work on that yet. Boone Gorges gives a good suggestion how to bring adding an RSS feed into the front end.
I’m sticking with Buddypress because I believe it has the most potential for the reasons I pointed out earlier and because I assume(d) that it will become more mature over time. But if the developer community sees Buddypress as just “an add-on to a blogging/CMS platform” aimed at communities of experienced bloggers, that would be a problem for me.
December 22, 2009 at 8:10 pm #59335In reply to: Is BuddyPress confusing to users?
Derek
ParticipantWhat are we talking about here guys? Only the blog creators will ever see the dashboard on a regular basis. All the users that are subscribers will rarely if ever see it. Create a subscriber account for yourself and check that for yourself. I think you all are being too demanding on software that is so young. BuddyPress as an add on to a blogging/CMS platform is what I want, not the other way around. If we go that route what are going to end up with? Gifts?
I think you all might want to check out some of those other software suites I mentioned previously (out of that bunch I really like Social Engine).
BTW the thought of gifts makes me vomit just a little…
December 22, 2009 at 7:59 pm #59333In reply to: Is BuddyPress confusing to users?
abcde666
Participant– BuddyPress is great !
– Creating Blogs with WPMU is great !
– the WP-platform is great !
Just giving the “WPMU-Dashboard” the SAME design and user-interface as we have at the current BuddyPress-default-theme, in order to make the full website look coherent.
That is the ONLY missing piece in the puzzle, at least for me.
December 22, 2009 at 7:52 pm #59332In reply to: Is BuddyPress confusing to users?
peterverkooijen
ParticipantI do see the potential. As I said earlier in this thread:
That’s why I believe Buddypress has a lot of potential. It’s a social network, but with a strong content publishing angle.
I’m absolutely not advocating copying Facebook etc. I’m a big believer in the idea of “private social networks”. And I actually think that adding old-fashioned forums dilutes the blog logic that should be Buddypress’ main strength.
Groups has enormous potential and seems to be pretty unique.
But imagine Buddypress being used by schools, companies, trade associations, sports clubs, etc. That is a very different audience from the experienced WordPress bloggers in the Buddypress development community.
December 22, 2009 at 7:42 pm #59331In reply to: Is BuddyPress confusing to users?
Derek
ParticipantI think that Bloggus, Peterverkooijen, and others are not seeing the potential. I looked REALLY hard at SocialEngine, JomSocial, and a few others (follow me @crankyderek for my complete list) in the end i came back to BuddyPress BECAUSE of the fact that the users that wanted to blog could create their own dynamic blogs! Why build a community that offers more or less the same functionality of Facebook or Myspace? Odds are most of your users are there already. Do you really think you are going to get a daily (Hell hourly if they play one of those Zygna games) Facebook user to come visit your site with the same frequency when all your community offers is duplicate functionality, copycat features and NONE or few of their friends… Don’t you see it’s the things that make BuddyPress different that will make it succeed.
December 22, 2009 at 7:33 pm #59330In reply to: external bbpress + buddypress
midwestbonsai
ParticipantInteresting, so is there a way to have the forums set up like they are here? I do not see any group forums here.
December 22, 2009 at 7:25 pm #59329In reply to: Is BuddyPress confusing to users?
bloggus
ParticipantErich73;
well honestly, I have then no idea why you use BP if you are using is only as Discussion-Forum with Groups.
I see BP as a plugin for WPMU and nothing else. If I want only a social platform, without the extensive WP blogs, then I would never go for BP. There are many other great softwares out there. (not that BP is bad
) For me blogs are the central point and the backbone of the system. Therefore I don’t understand the meaning of two backends.
December 22, 2009 at 7:13 pm #59328In reply to: Is BuddyPress confusing to users?
abcde666
Participant“Remember, wordpress.tv has a TON of tutorial videos for beginners as well.”
…. not sure my german-language-speaking users at the age of 50 and over, are going to watch a video in order to understand how my website works

Once you need a video to EXPLAIN how a website works, something is wrong.
I just think that the “WPMU-Dashboard-backend” is not a place I want my users to go into, so I had to dis-able the feature for users to be able to create their own blog. So my website is more like a Discussion-Forum with Groups

I guess giving the “WPMU-DashBoard-backend” the same DESIGN as we do have at testbp.org (default-theme) would solve the issue.
Anybody out there who is able to do this ? Maybe a plug-in ?
Please do not take this as an offense, I really do love BuddyPress very much and highly appreciate the work of Andy & team & the community
December 22, 2009 at 7:10 pm #59327In reply to: external bbpress + buddypress
r-a-y
KeymasterI don’t think site wide activity would work if you’re using a fresh, external install of bbPress.
That would need to be coded probably as a bbPress plugin. I highly recommend deep integration between WPMU and bbPress so you can gain access to WP’s function within bbPress. Otherwise, you need to do specific calls to the database.
If you’re going with the latter approach, for hints, look into how Boone Gorges coded the MediaWiki plugin, which also writes to the sitewide activity stream.
December 22, 2009 at 6:49 pm #59326In reply to: Is BuddyPress confusing to users?
bloggus
ParticipantWow, what a response, even if not everybody got my point.
For me personally, I would like to use only the dashboard and have BP plugins forms be located there and not having a special interface for the information. I have nothing against the dashboard backend and people get into it very fast.
In that case everything would be in the same place, now it is divided. Even if BP is a plugin, there is no reason to have two “backends” for users, like it is now.
[blockquote]
Quick posting from the front end is on the Roadmap.
[/blockquote]
That is for me totally not interesting, since this means splitting the input forms even more form the “two backends”.
December 22, 2009 at 6:18 pm #59325In reply to: Is BuddyPress confusing to users?
David Lewis
ParticipantQuick posting from the front end is on the Roadmap. They can’t give us everything we want immediately

I agree that having two interfaces is confusing for people who are use to things like Facebook. But as I say, the Dashboard isn’t likely to be overhauled anytime soon because a) it doesn’t need to be and b) it was just done earlier this year. Total overhaul.
But the Dashboard is a Blogging / CMS interface. For what it is, it’s world-class. In my opinion. But it’s not a social networking style interface where everything is done inline on the front end. No, that’s not ideal. I completely agree. But the alternatives have their own issues. So the choice of which open source software to use is really up to the individual.
December 22, 2009 at 6:11 pm #59324In reply to: Is BuddyPress confusing to users?
MrMaz
ParticipantI didn’t use the word “strictly”, I said it was what it did best. Huge difference.
Btw, I don’t speak for the BuddyPress creators. I am just another user like you.
December 22, 2009 at 5:50 pm #59323In reply to: BuddyPress Privacy Component: An Update
Diego
ParticipantThanks for the great work Jeff. I’m actually testing it, and seems pretty good. I’m interested seeing progresses in blog and friends privacy.
Would it be possible to edit the starting config? eg. all new user privacy options could be set on “all logged in users”?
If you like so, I could start translating the next version of the plugin in italian.
Thanks a lot
December 22, 2009 at 5:40 pm #59322In reply to: Is BuddyPress confusing to users?
peterverkooijen
ParticipantRemember, wordpress.tv has a TON of tutorial videos for beginners as well.
Those are useless to regular people signing up to a social network. Most bloggers know how WordPress works. That is not the problem. The problem for Buddypress is that the interface is not end-user focused, like Facebook, Ning, LinkedIn, etc.
I think some people want BuddyPress to be more than it is.
If Buddypress is strictly for communities of bloggers, a limited audience of experienced WordPress users, don’t promote it as a social network. Is Buddypress’ ambition really that limited? If it is, I need to look for another solution.
December 22, 2009 at 5:20 pm #59321In reply to: Is BuddyPress confusing to users?
Andrea Rennick
ParticipantRemember, wordpress.tv has a TON of tutorial videos for beginners as well.
December 22, 2009 at 5:05 pm #59320In reply to: BuddyPress Privacy Component: An Update
Jeff Sayre
ParticipantIf you have not yet tested or commented on my BuddyPress Privacy Component, now is the time. I am holding back on some of the work as I wait to see where the coding dust settles for BP v1.2.
You can get the Beta component here: http://jeffsayre.com/2009/12/05/buddypress-privacy-component-released/
For those who want to know more about BuddyPress, Privacy, and the issue of hooking your community up to other social networks, I’ve posted a new article here:
http://jeffsayre.com/2009/12/21/oauth-buddypress-and-privacy/
December 22, 2009 at 4:45 pm #59319In reply to: external bbpress + buddypress
midwestbonsai
ParticipantCookies seem to be working fine, when I am logged in to one or the other I am logged in to the other.
The only thing that seems not to work the the forum posts going to the “Site Wide Activity Stream” or “My Latest Activity”
Someone managed to get it to work here so I would think that t can be done.
December 22, 2009 at 4:41 pm #59318In reply to: Is BuddyPress confusing to users?
Derek
ParticipantThis is an excellent topic! With my new install I am finding that I am having to hand hold the new bloggers hands quite a bit more than just the average site “subscriber”. For the uninitiated the back end can be very confusing indeed. Overall though I think BuddyPress is very usable as is.
December 22, 2009 at 4:09 pm #59316In reply to: Is BuddyPress confusing to users?
Paul Wong-Gibbs
KeymasterThe early versions of the P2 theme had messy JS backend making it tricky to move (IMO).
Erich above wrote “An average user probably only wants to write some text and post an image or a video” – this is a different task than what the WP
posting backend was built to do. That’s why P2 was so popular because it encouraged microblogging using the WordPress platform.
-
AuthorSearch Results