Skip to:
Content
Pages
Categories
Search
Top
Bottom

Search Results for 'buddypress'

Viewing 25 results - 50,376 through 50,400 (of 68,985 total)
  • Author
    Search Results
  • #83458
    alanchrishughes
    Participant

    The only reason I would still be against the group idea is because of the same thing I mentioned a few posts back about people not wanting to sign up and register for a website, not everybody wants to joint a group, even though I know you don’t have to join a group in buddypress to comment in the group discussion, it still has a bit of bad taste in the user experience just because of the name “groups” it brings back bad high school memories of clicks and the cool kids groups.

    #83457
    Hugo Ashmore
    Participant

    Keep it quiet from JJJ as it just might be the straw that breaks the camels back… hmm camels don’t have stripes do they?

    :) sorry finding this subject hard to take seriously now, striping, should be the simplest thing!

    #83456
    djsteve
    Participant

    Has anyone made any progress with this? Will we have buddypress checking for banned email domains soon?
    Will we have buddypress checking for banned domains upon registration and perhaps even again upon activation?
    Can someone please add the possibility to add *.info in a way that works
    I know this won’t stop all spam and splogs – but I am getting tired of deleting a dozen spammers every day that are mostly from the same dozen domain names that I have added to the block list. This would save lots of people hlaf the splog deletions, and that adds up to a lot of time saved.
    BTW – has anyone tested buddypress with TTC Spam Bot Registration plugin (https://wordpress.org/extend/plugins/ttc-user-registration-bot-detector/ )to see if there are any issues? I am guessing it may still be bypassed by buddypress even if it worked in WP?

    Michael Sumner
    Participant
    #83452
    Jeff Sayre
    Participant

    I’m removing the alternating highlighting from the Privacy Component for the time being. The “fix” still has issues. It still selects for the entire form and not per table. If you add another row to the outputted settings tables in the Activity, Messages, or Friends form coding, you will see the issue when navigating to “Settings > Notifications” in your user profile menu.

    It is an issue of odd versus even rows in a given table. Right now, since all the outputted tables (a total of four tables are outputted to make up the aforementioned screen) each have an even number of rows, it appears that all works fine. But by doing what I suggest–adding a test odd row–you will see the problem.

    #83450
    @mercime
    Participant

    @retroriff – in your second post, you mentioned you followed the BP codex where you placed define bp site via “Specifically, you can do this by creating a file called “bp-custom.php” in your “/wp-content/plugins/” directory (if you haven’t already).”

    I would suggest that you delete the code you placed in bp-custom.php and add the code in wp-config.php per my post (ref: https://codex.buddypress.org/how-to-guides/changing-internal-configuration-settings/) – it works.

    #83449
    modemlooper
    Moderator

    @alanchrishughes They are EXACTLY like facebook fan pages. You have an activity stream on both. You have forum/discussions on both. Not sure why you think otherwise. You can also add apps to facebook fan pages and buddypress groups. They look different and the wording on each is different but they really are the same thing.

    #83447
    lincme.co.uk
    Member

    Ice-cream sundaes! Oh yes! :) Actually, that’s one direction Drupal has been going (not the ice-cream, sadly), which is the eventual simplification of data storage. The biggest problem now, I think, is that developers map their views to data, and vice-versa. Drupal stores everything and anything as a ‘node’. So a node can contain one word, a site link, a story, a page, images, files, or any combination of all by having nodes within nodes. Its Views module then allows you to say how nodes are displayed; as blocks (widgets), pages, in tables, rows, any kind of custom layout.

    What I’m visualising at present is a way of doing things like BP’s activity stream, where data is any kind of node you like, and you decide whether nodes can overflow or are cut (eg., large images), displayed all at once or shown as a bite (eg., stories/pages and small excerpts with ‘read more…’) etc. You then just decide whether each site page appears as a single page, a list of related nodes kinda bloggish, a list of related nodes a-la activity stream, etc. A couple of clicks could create a stream, a shopping page, or whatever you wish. Users then have BP style filtering links, so they can view everything the view shows, just friend’s contributions, just their groups, etc. Off-site information can be pulled in via links as well, and displayed as the same kind of node (similar data, just a different source). Wrap all that around an individual member with a profile and roles/permissions, and you have the most powerful and adaptable social network there is.

    As I say, you can do that with Drupal, but gawd is it time consuming for a large project. I like the way WordPress is going, and if BuddyPress follows suit in the simple and easy to use stakes, the two combined will be amazing.

    #83446
    alanchrishughes
    Participant

    @Peterverkooijen I really like the idea of them all being mixed together, if nothing else just to see what can be done, breaking down boundaries. Sometimes you just want to blurt something out facebook or twitter style into your stream, other times you want to post something with a bit of direction that you would post on a website,blog, or messageboard, but in the end it is all one user account, one profile, in one familiar place.

    And you do realize that bbpress still requires you to log in also right? When I suggested that I was referring to @lincme.co.uk talking about how one day blogs/forums/groups will merge into one thing. So it would embody aspects of social networking but also aspects of traditional websites and blogs which sometimes have 1 time visitors to read a news story and just want to ad a quick response. In the future this news article may be written as a forum post to a group, which is then query_posts(“showposts=10&category_name=whatever”); to a list on the front page of a website with a fancy little custom field thumbnail and excerpt.

    Or maybe one day all buddypress installations will be able to be connected in a way, like gravator, so that I could be logged into my favorite skate magazine website, but post a comment to an article on a political website and this would show up in my universal buddypress stream, and then there is a time machine and flux capacitor plugin that can make ice cream sundaes……

    #83445
    lincme.co.uk
    Member

    @peterverkooijen; Good points about the focus of a social network being on the member, while a forum is focussed more around the information. I think @alanchrishughes has a point too though, about non-techies being put off by having to register.many people are still terrified that if they enter their name and email address then you’ll have access to their bank account – seriously!

    I’ve built a number of sites in Drupal, which is very powerful indeed, and doesn’t suffer so much from update issues. It gives such fine control of everything that it’s amazing, and for those who haven’t tried it, you can basically build your own custom CMS with it. It takes so long to do though. We tried Elgg, which is kinda cool out of the box, and does a lot of social network things really well. However, its interface is naff (in my opinion) and theming is not easy. Worse still, adding extra pages to build a custom site means lots of coding, instead of WP’s simple click-to-add. We’re going to need that for custom background (paying) advert pages, and hopefully a lot of them as time goes on. Also, Elgg has almost no member control, roles, etc., and wile the Elgg team feel that’s not important, we strongly disagree. People do not behave nicely just because they signed up to a social network!

    Personally, I see nothing wrong with a social network which allows unregistered users to comment with CAPTCHA, along with well defined and easy to use groups for members to join, and good role management and strong privacy for those who require it. That way, just as in the real world, you can have private places and high streets, with members themselves controlling who does what. For me, at least, that’s all a social network need be.

    #83444
    thekmen
    Participant

    @andrea_r I didn’t know, will have a look for it, thanks.
    I need to update mine to add the BuddpPress 1.2.5 theme fixes.

    #83443
    Hugo Ashmore
    Participant

    I utterly refuse to use the phrase ‘Zebra Striping’ again; from now on I have decided it’s ‘Tiger Striping’ yeah and lets leave the poor giraffes alone.

    #83441
    Jeff Sayre
    Participant

    @hnla: I should have been more clear. With WP3.0, the “Activate” link for BuddyPress is replaced with “Network Only”. To activate BuddyPress, you have to click the “Network Activate” link.

    I have tracked down this issue. It is specific to WP 2.9.2 only. I thought I was seeing it in both WP 2.9.2 and WP 3.0. But, after reinstalling everything, I can only reproduce it in WP 2.9.2.

    Would someone please confirm this on a WP 2.9.2 install. I suppose it could be a quirk in my dev setup, but this issue did not exist with the four or five 1.2.5 branch versions that I tested yesterday.

    If others can replicate this issue, then the “Requires at least” tag in BP’s readme.txt file should be changed to WP 3.0. Otherwise, we will have people activating BP for a single blog, and not site wide–that is if they just click the “Activate” link in WP 2.9.2.

    Do we need to updated the information for plugin devs? Should they include the “Network: true” tag in the header of whatever file they consider their loader file?

    Sean Boone
    Participant

    I also just upgraded to 1.2.5 BuddyPress this morning and have this same problem.

    Using normal wordpress dashboard I cannot delete user… results in error message:

    Fatal error: Using $this when not in object context in /###/wp-content/plugins/buddypress/bp-groups/bp-groups-classes.php on line 1053

    *Note: I am not using “SuperAdmin”.
    *Note: I am using “Fluency Admin” however. Shouldn’t be the issue.

    When trying to delete user from front-end members page it simply does not delete the user at all. No error message or anything, it just doesn’t delete the user.

    #83439
    Sofian J. Anom
    Participant

    I just activate Buddypress 1.2.5 on Wodrdpress 3.0 Multisite without any problems. Can viewed on http://teronggosong.com.

    #83438
    Andrea Rennick
    Participant

    @thekmen you know there’s a trac ticket for twentyten to be included with BuddyPress?

    tim-watt
    Member

    I’d already added that patch but separate to that under 3.0 and the latest 1.2.5 the activity (in the home page of http://retrofitdiaries.org) only seems to include the top level blog activity.

    Activity Streams are set to work across the whole site (just one other test blog for now).

    Can anyone suggest a reason?

    Thanks

    #83435
    Joe Marino
    Participant

    I regret to inform that my second attempt to activate this plugin failed with the same exact problem as the first attempt (memory error). I have submitted a support thread on the WordPress forums specific to the W3TC plugin and I am awaiting a reply from the author of this plugin or anyone else who may be willing to offer further assistance.

    #83434
    retroriff
    Member

    @noizeburger Hi, I already changed the quotes before answering here. It is not working to me even with the right quotes. Thanks.

    helpy
    Participant

    Have a similar problem ;-)

    Prev. installation WP 3.0 and BP 1.2.4.1
    Upgraded to BP 1.2.5

    In the blog comments of the blog with id 2 I got some warnings:

    Warning: file_exists() [function.file-exists]: open_basedir restriction in effect. File(/is/htdocs/my-account-name/my-domain/www/wp-content/blogs.dir/1/files//avatars/3) is not within the allowed path(s): (/is/htdocs/user_tmp/my-account-name:/tmp:/dev/null:/dev/urandom:/bin:/usr:/is/default.errors:/is/htdocs/my-account-name) in /is/htdocs/my-account-name/my-domain/www/wp-content/plugins/buddypress/bp-core/bp-core-avatars.php on line 150

    The Problem is, that there is no directory /wp-content/blogs.dir/1 in my installation! Besides the main blog I created only a second one (/wp-content/blogs.dir/2).

    If I copy bp-core-avatars.php from BP 1.2.4.1 in my 1.2.5 installation the waring is gone! But this does not seem to be a proper solution because there a some changes in the php file …

    My solution, which I found some where else in this forum: I put the following two lines in /wp-content/plugins/bp-custom.php:

    define( ‘BP_AVATAR_URL’, ‘http://’ . $_SERVER . ‘/wp-content/uploads’ );
    define( ‘BP_AVATAR_UPLOAD_PATH’, $_SERVER . ‘/wp-content/uploads’ );

    The warning is gone :-)

    #83431
    peterverkooijen
    Participant

    “… but I think non-techies are thrown off by having to register for websites and checking their email, verifying, password, etc. they don’t care enough and just leave.”

    You can’t have a social network without verification of identity. You should just build your site in bbpress, punbb, joomla or drupal. Or Moodle.

    #83430

    In reply to: Forum rss feed broken

    Boone Gorges
    Keymaster

    Yes. https://buddypress.org/support/topics/feed/ should lead to topics (?) but gives the whole activity feed.

    #83426
    alanchrishughes
    Participant

    @lincme.co.uk I agree with you on basically all of this, but there is still the major organizational problem with the way things are setup now, like look at the url of this page and how overly complicated that is. Like I said before I agree with you that renaming “forums” to “groups” is a great idea and that could really cut down the url/organization of things to something much easier for non-techies to follow like

    thewebsite.com/groups/the-group-name/the-topic-title

    An off topic suggestion, but I think non-techies are thrown off by having to register for websites and checking their email, verifying, password, etc. they don’t care enough and just leave. Most blogs don’t require you to register, at most you just have to enter a captcha, maybe having an option for group creators to allow non-registered visitors comment on topics would increase interactivity. Just a thought.

    #83425
    Joe Marino
    Participant

    I have just upgraded my BuddyPress installation to version 1.2.5. I will be giving the W3TC plugin another trial run shortly.

    #83423
    peterverkooijen
    Participant

    “What is the idea even behind this “groups” concept? I have been trying to understand it and figure out a way to just work with it, but it just doesn’t make sense, it’s backwards.”

    “It’s like facebook fan pages. Why do people find this concept so strange?”

    This is again the clash between forum and social network. They are NOT the same thing! They are different ways to structure a community. Mixing them is a recipe for disaster. Buddypress is pulled in two directions. The old-fashioned forum structure (bbpress) is winning.

    A social network is organized around members. Member profiles are the main home pages, usually including a wire or blog. Members can friend or follow eachother and form groups and share content.

    A forum is organized around topics. Members are secundary and are usually identified by anonymous usernames. Topics are arranged linearly, with main topics and sub-topics.

    Because member management is horribly underdeveloped in Buddypress and the old BBpress users now set the tone in the developers community, Buddypress is turning into a confused forum script.

Viewing 25 results - 50,376 through 50,400 (of 68,985 total)
Skip to toolbar