Skip to:
Content
Pages
Categories
Search
Top
Bottom

Search Results for 'buddypress'

Viewing 25 results - 57,226 through 57,250 (of 68,919 total)
  • Author
    Search Results
  • #65908
    Dwenaus
    Participant

    hey @andrew_s1 I totally agree that is a better implementation, and I was going to initially do it that way, however my requests for filter and action hook additions seem to take a low priority (rightly so) and I was concerned that future BP updates would break the plugin. Do you think I should wait until the hook is added before I make the change in the code, and force people to upgrade their template, or leave it as is with javascript for the meantime?

    hmmm. maybe if I learn to make diff files for trac, my suggestions are more likely to be implemented…

    #65901
    snark
    Participant

    I don’t consider this a “generic” feature request, but an important element of increasing usability. Microblogging is fine for small to medium-sized “trusted” community, but not for the site I am redesigning, which has a forum with nearly 20,000 users. Most users are short-term, looking for solutions to a problem, and once they get what they came for, most never return. I’m hoping to change that with the new BuddyPress design.

    The site I am developing is all about a variety of user interaction in one place, and allowing 20,000 strangers to each have their own blog would be a disaster. Most people don’t want or need their own blog any more, and prefer to publish and interact in one centralized, standardized location — hence the popularity of Facebook.

    So, I think the real value in BP is Groups + Forum: Groups for looser, more spontaneous communication, like Facebook, and Forums for more structured, searchable and archived collections of information. If you @Peterverkooijen are not interested in Forums, but want to give your users blogs, that’s fine — just use WPMU, or WPMU + BuddyPress but disable the Forums.

    Forums have great value for many types of sites — we’re successfully using one right now, in fact.

    #65899
    chip-d
    Member

    I too have also tried to use the tutorial that carrotcreative has mentioned, but not managed to get it working. The reason for my problem though I believe is that I am trying to use BuddyPress 1.2.1 on a standalone installation of WordPress 2.9.2. The tutorial is referencing the hook “bp_core_activate_account” which as far as I can see is in turn calling the function “wpmu_activate_signup” which I am guessing doesn’t exist outside of MU.

    I’ve tried using the “user_register” too hook onto and run the “update_usermeta” ,but that doesn’t appear to be working. Does anyone know what hook should be used for standalone WordPress in the absence of “bp_core_activate_account”

    Thanks.

    r-a-y
    Keymaster

    You’ll need to install bbPress as an external install.

    Download bbPress @ bbpress.org/download.

    Find integration guides @ bbpress.org/forums or this link:

    http://theeasybutton.com/blog/2009/07/17/integrating-buddypress-wordpress-mu-and-bbpress/

    Omit the BP integration steps in that guide.

    peterverkooijen
    Participant

    Why don’t you just use WPMU + BBpress as your starting point?

    Buddypress is next generation social networking. It offers features that end-users have come to expect via Facebook, LinkedIn, etc. Groups are an integral part of that; forums are an awkward add-on imho.

    #65888
    silversurferes
    Participant

    i have a webspace with 10 GB

    so, space is more than enough

    #65883

    In reply to: bbPress issue

    r-a-y
    Keymaster

    If you have BP installed on connect.idotter.ch, you should be able to access your group forums at connect.idotter.ch/forums.

    How are you trying to install the forums component? It should be as easy as going to “BuddyPress > Forums setup” in the WP admin backend.

    #65881
    nobribe
    Member

    I am trying to install Buddypress 1.2 with WordPress 2.9.1 (SU) & Buddypress Tempalte Pack. I am unable to activate Buddpress. It gives a Error 500: Internal server error. Please help.

    #65880
    peterverkooijen
    Participant

    Aren’t there loads of plugins for these types of features?

    All these feature request threads start to get on my nerves – I should cut back on coffee… – when I’m still wasting way too much time trying to fix basic core management and usability issues in my sites.

    And forums shouldn’t even be in Buddypress at all imho. It’s an older generation web community format that clashes with the new social networking paradigms. BP should focus on groups and (micro)blogging and turn that into a solid and coherent platform, not get sidetracked by forums and all these generic feature requests.

    #65879
    danbpfr
    Participant

    Have you tried to use your WPMU alone at first ?

    I recommand you to test anything in WPMU (creating blogs, users, sending mails, etc)

    If all is ok, install buddypress and deactivate all the 7 BP plugins (buddypress ->options) exept one . View if it’s working, activate the second, and so on…

    #65878
    danbpfr
    Participant

    See your server configuration. Could be a php memory problem. WPMU need at least 64 Mb…

    #65876
    snark
    Participant

    There is a new plugin I just found called BuddyPress Rate Forum Posts — https://wordpress.org/extend/plugins/buddypress-rate-forum-posts/. I haven’t tried it yet, but I plan to. It allows thumbs up/down voting on Forum posts and in the process users receive “karma points” for the quality and frequency of their posts. So, in theory, spammers would get bad karma scores from other users, and you could search for users with bad karma and then delete them.

    #65872
    MrMaz
    Participant

    @pnju

    Just override the style in your child theme.

    #65870
    geoffm33
    Participant

    @pjnu what globe icon are you referring to?

    #65866
    PJ
    Participant

    @MrMaz, please change the font color next to the globe icon to a link color, not the gray color

    Users of the site had noooo idea that that text to the right of the globe icon are links. Since its large, in a heading font and gray, it’s reasonable for someone to have difficulty finding out that that’s how you get to the links.

    Could you please update the code so it’s the same font color as links elsewhere on the site?? Thank you.

    #65855
    21cdb
    Participant

    @mike that would clearly accomplish the main goal of this idea. I totally agree with you that forums are the best way to have complex and ordered discussions.

    The reason i posted this idea as “Forums based on Activity-Items (instead of bbPress)” and not just as “Frontpage Forum Posts” is that i thought it would be great if the forums could directly benefit from improvements on the Activity Stream Technology in the future.

    For instance if there would be “Global Content Tagging” (https://buddypress.org/forums/topic/global-content-tagging) and “Attachments for Activity Items” (https://buddypress.org/forums/topic/attachments-for-activity-items) added in a future version of BP the forums could directly benefit of this features, because they were build with the same technology. This should be valid for plugins too. I know this would be a big step, certainly with some drawbacks at the beginnig, but overall i believe this would be more straight forward and future proof.

    #65850
    Mike Pratt
    Participant

    @Dwenaus I was thinking of a Group Categorization plugin to allow me to sgment the directory and showcase groups better but this might very well fit the bill. Are group tags exposed via functions inyour plugin so we can shape a directory listing (or even avail in a variable eg bp_get_group_tag() ?

    #65846
    andrew_s1
    Participant

    I’ve just attached the theme patch to the trac ticket here https://trac.buddypress.org/ticket/2063#comment:1

    #65845
    andrew_s1
    Participant

    trac ticket and patch are here https://trac.buddypress.org/ticket/2063#comment:1

    whoops – just collided with @Erich73

    anyway, my patch would be for adding links to report posts as abusive, rather than for tackling the issue of group creation

    #65844
    abcde666
    Participant
    #65843
    sakthig
    Participant

    Yes i think the issue is not yet resolved by buddypress!

    Being a admin of my group forum i can not moderate the forum topics that posted by others .

    Any answers from our members?

    #65841
    andrew_s1
    Participant

    I’ve just proposed the adding of a new action hook that would make it easy to develop a plugin for this. The action hook is suggested for another purpose, but would work for this purpose as well.

    See https://buddypress.org/forums/topic/new-plugin-buddypress-rate-forum-posts/page/2#post-39751 – the proposed action is bp_single_forum_topic_links

    If that hook gets incorporated, then writing a plugin to do what you want would be very easy.

    Alternatively, you could also just modify your theme directly, to add it. See the theme file groups/single/forum/topic.php</b> , in the loop:

    while ( bp_forum_topic_posts() ) : bp_the_forum_topic_post();

    #65840
    John Stringfellow
    Participant

    Update:

    I just found another possible culprit/conflict. In BP member profiles, any words that could become tags that relate members to each other become links. These links might be causing some conflicts in the database because they are not displaying. For instance, I have an Essex County Category that is not displaying and a Essex County link that is not displaying in a buddypress profile. The Essex County Category sends you to the homepage when you click on it and the Essex County profile link sends you to the Members Listing Page.

    BNJ

    #65839
    andrew_s1
    Participant

    At the moment, the classes are added to individual posts in a topic, by javascript. This results in extra server load, because wordpress has to do two whole startups for each such page. The trade-off is adding another apply_filter and a do_action to the theme, but as this plugin already benefits from one such proposed theme change, we can get two for the price of one.

    Proposed change to buddypress/bp-themes/bp-default/groups/single/forum/topic.php, from line 26:

    <ul id="topic-post-list" class="item-list">
    <?php while ( bp_forum_topic_posts() ) : bp_the_forum_topic_post(); ?>
    <li <?php
    $topic_post_id = bp_get_the_topic_post_id();
    echo "id='post-$topic_post_id' class='",
    apply_filters('bp_single_forum_topic_post_css',array('class'=>'', 'post_id'=>$topic_post_id)),
    "'";
    ?> >
    <div class="poster-meta">
    <a href="<?php bp_the_topic_post_poster_link() ?>">
    <?php bp_the_topic_post_poster_avatar( 'width=40&height=40' ) ?>
    </a>
    <?php echo sprintf( __( '%s said %s ago:', 'buddypress' ), bp_get_the_topic_post_poster_name(), bp_get_the_topic_post_time_since() ) ?>
    </div>

    <div class="post-content">
    <?php bp_the_topic_post_content() ?>
    </div>

    <div class="admin-links">
    <?php
    if ( bp_group_is_admin() || bp_group_is_mod() || bp_get_the_topic_post_is_mine() ) :
    bp_the_topic_post_admin_links();
    endif;
    do_action( 'bp_single_forum_topic_links' , $topic_post_id );
    ?>
    <a href="#post-<?php echo $topic_post_id; ?>" title="<?php _e( 'Permanent link to this post', 'buddypress' ) ?>">#</a>
    </div>
    </li>
    <?php endwhile; ?>
    </ul>

    Proposed change to buddypress-rate-forum-posts/bp-rate-forum-posts.php, insert:

    // modifies the css class for topics to highlight popular posts, and hide very unpopular ones
    function rfp_css_class_for_post($args) {
    global $rfp;
    $class = $args['class'];
    $post_rating = rfp_get_post_rating( $args['post_id'] );
    $rfpclass = '';
    error_log('rfp='.print_r($rfp,true));
    if ( $post_rating == NULL )
    $rfpclass = '';
    else if ( $post_rating >= $rfp->superboost )
    $rfpclass = 'rfp-superboost';
    elseif ( $post_rating >= $rfp->boost )
    $rfpclass = 'rfp-boost';
    elseif ( $post_rating <= $rfp->hide )
    $rfpclass = 'rfp-hide';
    elseif ( $post_rating <= $rfp->diminish )
    $rfpclass = 'rfp-diminish';
    //error_log("in rfp_css_class_for_post rating '$post_rating' adding class '$rfpclass' to '$class' with args ".print_r($args,true));
    return $class.($class?' ':'').$rfpclass;
    }
    add_filter( 'bp_single_forum_topic_post_css', 'rfp_css_class_for_post', 3);

    function rfp_echo_hidden_post_link($post_id) {
    global $rfp;
    $post_rating = rfp_get_post_rating( $post_id );
    if ( $post_rating && $post_rating <= $rfp->hide )
    echo "<span class='rfp-show' onclick='jQuery(this).remove();jQuery("#post-$post_id").removeClass( "rfp-hide" );'>Click to show this hidden post</span>";
    }
    add_action( 'bp_single_forum_topic_links', 'rfp_echo_hidden_post_link', 3);

    And then the javascript section starting jQuery(document).ready( function() can be removed from buddypress-rate-forum-posts/js, and the corresponding section can be removed from the end of buddypress-rate-forum-posts/rate.php

    #65833

    In reply to: Wire 1.2

    xspringe
    Participant

    @mentionsw I agree with your opinion that buddypress shouldn’t try to copy the Twitter model for user to user interaction. The Twitter design excels at some forms of user to user interaction but is incredibly awkward and difficult to use for doing something as simple as initiating and holding a conversation.

    It’s no secret that the overwhelming majority of Twitter users stop tend to quickly stop participating in two-way conversations and instead become passive consumers of updates by a small group of very active twitter users. This is in a large part due to the fact that the twitter system is very unfriendly towards bidirectional user interaction. Even with a Twitter client it can be really easy to loose track of a conversation because @mentions are linked to the user instead of a specific tweet. Facebook and similarly designed services are vastly superior in this regard.

    I don’t think buddypress should be copying the Twitter system while at the same time excluding the systems such as Facebook and Myspace which the large majority of people are accustomed with. Instead, the twitter system should be part of a system that gives buddypress users the option of different types of user to user interaction instead of forcing them to use one particular style.

    On a side note, I don’t think this has anything to do with a generation gap between Twitter users and Facebook users. Sites like Twitter, Facebook, Myspace, Youtube all have different kinds of qualities that are suited to satisfy specific social needs of their respective users. For some needs people are more likely to use one network and for other needs people are more likely to use another network. Just because the Twitter system is relatively new and currently being hyped doesn’t make it superior to other systems.

Viewing 25 results - 57,226 through 57,250 (of 68,919 total)
Skip to toolbar