Search Results for 'buddypress'
-
AuthorSearch Results
-
December 11, 2009 at 10:40 pm #58520
In reply to: Themeing Best Practices (Question)
@mercime
Participant@foodin65 – You could make your main site’s theme into a BP child theme to make it easier to get the functionalities you want in your site and make it future-proof. Given that Andy has coded the BP Parent Theme with dynamic and multiple body classes as well as other styling hooks within the body content, you could target certain sections of the site with different layouts, it makes a lot of sense.
With child themes, updating BuddyPress is almost seamless. You would only need to add or update some selectors and/or declarations in style.css instead of having to find out almost each and every new BP feature and updating them in your WP-turned-BP theme files plus style.css.
December 11, 2009 at 9:25 pm #58516In reply to: User / messaging exploit? Causing spam
r-a-y
KeymasterSounds like someone exploited a WordPress vulnerability on your site.
Are you using the latest version of WPMU / BuddyPress?
If so, did you upgrade?
You might want to read these posts:
https://wordpress.org/development/2009/09/keep-wordpress-secure/
December 11, 2009 at 7:59 pm #58511In reply to: Fighting Splogs
bcbccouk
Participantstwc’s summary of methods does seem to stop a lot of spam, but I’ve still been having some. I tried SI Capthca (https://wordpress.org/extend/plugins/si-captcha-for-wordpress) but that seemed completely ineffective.
My latest weapon in the war has been to modify Invisible Defender (https://wordpress.org/extend/plugins/invisible-defender) firstly to make it work with the buddypress registration page and secondly obfuscate its hidden fields by giving them random names and values:
http://bcbc.co.uk/mu/blog/2009/12/11/wordpress-registration-spam/
December 11, 2009 at 7:49 pm #58510In reply to: Enterprise Buddypress
Jeff Sayre
ParticipantYes, what is this “proprietary component”? Or is that information proprietary? LOL. I assume it centres around collaboration and / or document management perhaps?
Haha!
Yes, can I sound anymore stuck up than throwing around the term proprietary on an Open Source software forum.
To answer your third question first, yes.
As to your first two questions, I can only give you the most nebulous of details at this time. The component I’m working on is very specific to the site. It will be the primary collaboration and project management engine. So, it will not be something I will make available to the community. Besides, with the exception of using this component to become a direct competitor, it will not have any value to anyone else.
December 11, 2009 at 7:12 pm #58507In reply to: New Groupblog Plugin
Mariusooms
ParticipantI completely understand and feel your pain Mike, I deal with the same issues. It is a balance how you keep it simple yet powerful. Let me first explain the url structure. Buddypress creates groups using the defined constant as a path variable. By default that is ‘groups’, therefore wpmu blogs could never reside inside the same subdirectory because of conflicts. WPMU creates blogs in the root directory. Also WPMU does not allow blogs to be created with dashes or names that or less than 4 characters.
So -> http://mjpratt.com/groups/usma-1987
becomes -> http://mjpratt.com/usma1987
becasue the blog gets created in the root and is stripped from the dashes.
To stay completely in the group structure would require pulling in the correct data based on the blog id. This is certainly possible, but not a great way to develop. Therefore I’m almost inclined to think the otherway around. Utilize buddypress for profiles and pull in group related info into a blog structure. So I would redirect http://mjpratt.com/groups/usma-1987 to http://mjpratt.com/usma1987. Offcourse the group has many other components, so it is neither ideal.
I guess what you really are after is not really a group blog, but, and yes, yet, bp-groupblog probably comes closest.
Let’s see what we can do come bp-groupblog version 2. It is a work in progress and with community feedback in can develop into something truely and universally useful.
December 11, 2009 at 7:10 pm #58505In reply to: Enterprise Buddypress
David Lewis
ParticipantBy document management I don’t mean something big and hairy like Stellent. I don’t think any Intranet would ever replace such a system not should it necessarily try. All I’m thinking is that in any kind of “Enterprise” solution, Groups should be able to do some level of collaboration on simple documents as well as offering basic downloads. How many times per day is the HR Department asked for a Benefits Claim Form for instance? So I’m just talking about commonly requested documents for employees. Not a massive database of Specs or Material Safety Data Sheets or what have you.
Another beneficial feature for enterprise would be the Jive concept of “Spaces”… which are nothing more than collections of groups. So your Head Office “Space” could have an IT Group, Service Desk Group, HR Group, etc.
But of course… depending on your needs… BuddyPress could work right now. “Enterprise” generally means decently sized corporations however… and in that space… privacy, security and some level of “document management” (as least having a small downloads area in each group) are essentials. Most of this is already in the BuddyPress roadmap. I think that in a few years… BuddyPress may well give products like Jive, Telligent, SocialText and other “Facebook for Enterprise” apps a run for their money.
December 11, 2009 at 6:58 pm #58504In reply to: Themeing Best Practices (Question)
Andrea Rennick
ParticipantYou just need another theme for BP activated on the BP blog. That’s the terminology you’re looking for.
this thread might help:
https://buddypress.org/forums/topic/intergrating-bp-with-existing-wordpress-theme
https://buddypress.org/forums/topic/extending-wordpress-themes-post-experiences
December 11, 2009 at 6:20 pm #58499In reply to: Activation email missing data
Paul Wong-Gibbs
KeymasterDecember 11, 2009 at 5:58 pm #58496In reply to: Enterprise Buddypress
Jamie Marsland
ParticipantI think it depends how you define enterprise software.
In my experience working with Local Authorities in the UK, BP will be more than adequate to improve communication internally and externally. We are doing projects with Local Authorities/social care/health in the UK where out of the box BP would be 200% better than what they currently have. There key drivers for our customers are flexibility, speed, departmental control.
They normally aren’t looking for project management, document management as they already have expensive process driven software systems in place that are controlled by corporate IT. When we pitch we are not pitching that BP will do everything, indeed i would argue that it shouldn’t do document management, that’s not it’s strength. It should focus on improving the things it does really well.
December 11, 2009 at 5:24 pm #58492In reply to: Themeing Best Practices (Question)
David Lewis
ParticipantIs there any reason why you made the buddypress site a subdomain rather than just being installed on the main blog?
December 11, 2009 at 5:20 pm #58491In reply to: Enterprise Buddypress
David Lewis
ParticipantYes, what is this “proprietary component”? Or is that information proprietary? LOL. I assume it centres around collaboration and / or document management perhaps?
Jive even has simple project management built in… which is pretty cool. It’s not MS Project by any means… but it would suffice for most simple projects.
December 11, 2009 at 5:11 pm #58490In reply to: Enterprise Buddypress
Leah
ParticipantWell, I’m not especially fond of the word enterprice but since english is not my native language, thats what went into the title. It’s all about usefull tools in a social context and the Privacy Component is a important part of it. Looks good from what I’ve read and I will definitely check it out.
Would you elaborate on your proprietary component? Sounds interesting to say the least
December 11, 2009 at 3:08 pm #58482In reply to: Enterprise Buddypress
Jeff Sayre
ParticipantI agree that a stock install of BP does not currently offer a sufficiently robust suite of tools for the enterprise. That will come in time via core enhancements and 3rd-party plugins.
I’m currently developing an enterprise-level, collaborative community site using BuddyPress as the foundation. So, it can be done—but not without a lot of work. For my site, I am coding a proprietary component that will be the main workhorse of the community.
By the way, my BuddyPress Privacy Component is available right now. Although it is still in Beta, it is very solid and much further along than what most people expect in a Beta release. You can grab it here: http://jeffsayre.com/buddypress/
December 11, 2009 at 3:04 pm #58481In reply to: Allow image plugin in forums
h4x3d
Participanthas anyone transformed this to buddypress xprofiles?
so that for instance specific tags/html is allowed on profile pages?
this would be really handy.
December 11, 2009 at 2:26 pm #58479In reply to: buddypress = Content Aggregator
gpo1
ParticipantCool, liaise with life-stream developer twitter.com/wplifestream or Nicola :bp?
December 11, 2009 at 2:18 pm #58478In reply to: Activation email missing data
Xevo
ParticipantA you redirecting to the buddypress pages? You shouldn’t use the standard wpmu register and activation. I remember Andy saying that he fixed this, but I guess it isn’t working like it should yet.
Try this.
December 11, 2009 at 1:45 pm #58475In reply to: BP-Tricks.com (new post updates)
Jeff Sayre
ParticipantNice work! It is a welcome addition, and generous contribution, to the BuddyPress community.
December 11, 2009 at 10:19 am #58465In reply to: buddypress = Content Aggregator
idotter
Participantyou can have a look at it at idotter.ch/wpmu i’m currently testing it and it only shows activity from one user … waht i’d liek to have would be activity from all registered users
December 11, 2009 at 8:43 am #58462In reply to: buddypress = Content Aggregator
gpo1
ParticipantWOW..LifeStream-plugin works with BP in what way? can you screen pic it?
liaise with the LifeStream-plugin developer or Nicola help?
December 10, 2009 at 10:17 pm #58437In reply to: Group Wiki Plugin (not a release, but in progress)
D Cartwright
ParticipantPerhaps we should think about what exactly we want it to do – I’d love to work together as long as we all have a solid plan for features/etc

I’ve probably not explained our feature set that well above (and to be honest, it’s still in a state of flux) but it closely matches what I would like to do in a ‘proper’ wiki inplementation. I guess I basically want it to be very buddypress-groups-focussed and I also have a strong aversion to the WP backend so ideally all editing will be done within the buddypress frontend.
December 10, 2009 at 9:45 pm #58436In reply to: Group Wiki Plugin (not a release, but in progress)
Paul Wong-Gibbs
KeymasterI’d be interested in working on a Wiki-type system for BuddyPress.
December 10, 2009 at 8:42 pm #58434In reply to: Enterprise Buddypress
David Lewis
ParticipantI’d say that BuddyPress is a ways away from being ready for enterprise. No privacy / security settings and no collaboration features or document management. Privacy is coming… but I imagine that collaboration features are a long way off. Altho’ there is an active thread currently about someone trying to wedge MediaWiki into BuddyPress groups. Which would help.
Yes, there are a TON of intranet solutions competing in the Enterprise space now. Basically Wiki’s and document management within a social context… rather than a document context. Much more engaging. Everyone is trying to create the winning “Facebook for Enterprise”. PB Works, Jive and SocialText are just a few. PB seems not to be in the same league. SocialText is ugly and awkward on a lot of levels. And it’s written in Perl for pete’s sake. I’m not sure how they got so much mindshare. Jive on the other hand is spectacular. Amazing application. Well worth the piles of cash they ask for it (to enterprise anyway).
December 10, 2009 at 8:16 pm #58431In reply to: buddypress = Content Aggregator
idotter
Participanti found something interresting: LifeStream is a WP-Plugin, but also works with WP MU and buddypress. Now I’m having a look how to integrate LifeStream-plugin into wire/activitystream (they seem to get connected in BP 1.2) … but i think i’ll need some help.
December 10, 2009 at 6:37 pm #58423In reply to: Enterprise Buddypress
Jamie Marsland
ParticipantI agree. We are doing a number of Stakeholder Engagement programs with Local Government in the UK. The #1 driver for our customers is improving communication throughout a geographically diverse workforce. Local Government is awash with failed intranets/collaboration websites, with ms sharepoint the most common platform. There is big opportunity to build discrete tools like you say (project management/document management etc) on top of wordpress, buddypress. Buddypress will win because it’s focused on engagement not transactional processes. Getting the community engaged is the real challenge and Andy P and the wordpress team naturally understand that.
December 10, 2009 at 5:30 pm #58420In reply to: Group Wiki Plugin (not a release, but in progress)
D Cartwright
ParticipantWe’re using mediawiki at the moment. I was considering just creating a basic wiki from scratch (as I belive it would be a similar amount of work and achieve a better result) but other people involved in the project thought it was best to stick with the already partially integrated mediawiki due to the time constraints on the project… Which is fair enough, we’re running in quite a tight timeframe.
The reason we’ve gone for fck is that it’s available as a plugin to mediawiki already. It wouldn’t be my first choice if it weren’t for that.
Unfortunately there are a lot of constraints on what we can do due to limited time and work-based politics. We’ve had to fight hard to not be stuck using Confluence wiki within Blackboard, despite the fact that the student take up in just 4 months has literally been 300 times greater in our first Buddypress system compared to a similar attempt using Blackboard. (changed wording a little to make it slightly more anonymous)
-
AuthorSearch Results