Skip to:
Content
Pages
Categories
Search
Top
Bottom

Search Results for 'private'

Viewing 25 results - 3,776 through 3,800 (of 3,869 total)
  • Author
    Search Results
  • #40098
    fishbowl81
    Participant

    We need to get Andy to changed the member theme not to show private profile fields, and then use those private profile fields in custom boxes to diaplay stuff. This would be a great way to ask for zipcode, and build a custom module to show a Google Map, or ask for birthday and just show a count down timer until their birthday.

    Where I don’t expect this to be in the 1st version, but would be nice to get the details hammered out in early post release versions.

    Brad

    #40083
    mspecht
    Participant

    You could always roll your own, https://buddypress.org/forums/topic.php?id=1651

    #40079
    ngsonst
    Participant
    #40074
    akelley
    Member

    Same!

    Thank you in advance for your time and consideration. I would like a few of my pages on my mu install to be open such as the index page, about us, media, and contact us, but I am looking to have the rest of the site including buddypress and all blogs private and member only!

    #39990
    Burt Adsit
    Participant

    That must be a feature I hadn’t noticed. :)

    If your blogs are set to private the activity will not show. Check Settings > Privacy. It should be “I would like my blog to be visible to everyone…”

    Burt Adsit
    Participant

    Brent, is this resolved?

    That is a good idea for a plugin.

    Is this something you are recommending be included with BuddyPress, or that someone optionally make this for you?

    If you want it to be part of BuddyPress, add it as an enhancement by using the Trac:

    https://trac.buddypress.org/login

    You can use your same login and password as for these forums.

    Create a new ticket, and under type, select “enhancement.”

    If you’d like someone to take this task on for you privately, you will want to explore being added to one of the development mailing lists (which I don’t have a link to right this second but will find for you shortly.)

    #39701
    fishbowl81
    Participant

    I hope Andy releases some code to support some of these Easter Eggs. Maybe we should hold an Easter Egg hunt, with prizes for everyone who can find unused Database fields or unused functions in the code. I know of a 1/2 dozen which I would really like to see implemented soon.

    Brad

    #39700
    fishbowl81
    Participant

    you can…

    do this.. mark fields as private, change your profile fields to dispaly public only, and then use the values to generate a customer profile box.

    You can easily get profile values directly, and can perform any calculations you want based on these values. But I’m sure it might be a little confusing to show these, so you need to have them marked as private. These private fields will not be shown once you modify the profile member theme.

    Hope that gives you some ideas,

    Brad

    #39587

    In reply to: BP-FBConnect Plugin

    benny148148
    Participant

    or maybe something that makes the slug for private profiles the user’s email address name prior to the @symbol….ie benny148148@gmail.com would create a benny148148 slug…and somebody who signs up on a later date with benny148148@hotmail.com would get benny1481482 as their slug, or something similar.

    Not sure how difficult this would be…assuming it’s even possible at all. It would definitely be prettier than the facebookuserX…of course, we’ll probably never be happy :D

    Thanks again for this plugin!

    #39583
    jeff-sayre
    Participant

    Hi John:

    Is the permissions plugin the same thing as the privacy component Andy mentions in this thread (post #4)? https://buddypress.org/forums/topic.php?id=39#post-158

    I literally just started (i.e. this morning) coding a bare-bones privacy plugin for BP that in essence controls privacy at the profile subgroup level.

    A simple radio button array appears in each subgroup’s title bar with options to grant or deny viewing access. It offers the following granular subgroup level of control:

    • allow/deny anyone (i.e. globally public or private)
    • allow/deny only logged in users
    • allow/deny only friends

    It’s not much of a privacy filter, but it is a start.

    If it is the case that V1.1 will have the first generation of the privacy component, then perhaps I should simply wait. I’m sure the core developers will provide a more powerful (and better) solution than I could.

    Jeff

    #39580
    bigkill
    Participant

    thank you for advice.. but you guys must think I’m a programmer.. sorry Im just a networking guy with web design hobby. When it comes to PHP I’m a green horn but have been hacking WP for some time now with decent success. with that said here is where I stand and what I have tried.. so far no good

    I have been working in bp-core-signup.php

    I inserted this ***** add_action( ‘signup_extra_fields’, ‘public.php’ ); *****

    before line (and tried it after ) 123ish

    do_action( ‘signup_extra_fields’, $errors );

    and also

    I inserted this

    add_filter( ‘wpmu_validate_user_signup’, ‘private.php’, 10, 1 );

    before line (and tried it after )

    return wpmu_validate_user_signup($_POST, $_POST);

    am i putting it in the right areas??

    the code in public.php is a follows:

    <?php
    require_once('recaptchalib.php');
    $publickey = "…"; // you got this from the signup page
    echo recaptcha_get_html($publickey);
    ?>

    the code in private.php is a follows:

    `

    <?php

    require_once(‘recaptchalib.php’);

    $privatekey = “…”;

    $resp = recaptcha_check_answer ($privatekey,

    $_SERVER[“REMOTE_ADDR”],

    $_POST[“recaptcha_challenge_field”],

    $_POST[“recaptcha_response_field”]);

    if (!$resp->is_valid) {

    die (“The reCAPTCHA wasn’t entered correctly. Go back and try it again.” .

    “(reCAPTCHA said: ” . $resp->error . “)”);

    }

    ?>

    I did indeed try adding the code directly in the fields (both with and without php tags) ** add_action( ‘signup_extra_fields’, ‘code-from-above-pasted-here’ ); ** .. that didn’t work out..

    Help please? Thanks

    #39562

    In reply to: BP-FBConnect Plugin

    @hempsworth, I think the scope of this plugin for right now is really just getting the initial sign-up/login functionality down. Creating a virtual link between facebook and BuddyPress, while a cool idea, is actually quite a task considering the complexity of fbl.

    After speaking with Andy last night, part of the problem comes from how Facebook locks down your profile if it’s set to be private (which I’m willing to bet a majority are these days.) If your profile is private, all you get is the facebook user_id, and that’s it.

    As far as having the feeds sync up, it would take an active facebook plugin to feed info to both places from both directions. It is a great idea though. I personally wish my Facebook would update my twitter and vice versa.

    #39554
    kennibc
    Participant

    I had to make the whole site private using this plugin:

    http://premium.wpmudev.org/project/sitewide-privacy-options-for-wordpress-mu

    There is a free version of this plugin, but we wanted to be able to override the settings by site admin only.

    You cannot access any page on the site without logging in first. This works for us since we don’t want outside access to students. On rare occasions where the teacher wants the students to blog publicly, I can override the setting for the specific blogs.

    #39553
    gpo1
    Participant

    @kennibc.That’s good.

    How do you make members & groups private?

    #39547
    kennibc
    Participant

    Thanks Jalien. Your post worked perfectly for the Blog Listing Page. However, there is also the sidebar widget which pulls the most recent posts from the private blogs which is not working. Because the blogs are private, I guess I need to find that widget file as well so I can make the changes.

    Any suggestions? I will be searching…

    #39544

    In reply to: BP-FBConnect Plugin

    Paul Wong-Gibbs
    Keymaster

    Reading the above please would someone clarify what “username” BP thinks it ends up with? Using urls of like /members/facebookuser1…100/ isn’t ideal. Also what happens if the profile is private? At work at the mo so can’t test – thanks

    #39492

    There’s actually a few little Easter eggs in the database that aren’t being used yet, but are planned for future use.

    My suggestion would be to wait until it’s time, but if you’re comfortable making some modifications that will end up being trumped by a future update, that sounds like one possible way to accomplish that.

    #39490

    In reply to: Tagged style pet game?

    fishbowl81
    Participant

    I have built 2 components, 1 being a token system, and the 2nd being badges.

    The tokens can be purchased via paypal, or earned from site admins. They can be used to by “gifts” to give to other members.

    The badges are like setup like private gifts that have membership criteria, such as # of blog posts or # number of friends.

    Setting up these wasn’t hard, and adding on a login action, to increase number of tokens if last login was over 4 hours ago wouldn’t be hard.

    Buying and selling friends is pretty easy too, a little over done but can be built easily.

    My suggestion take advantage of user meta and site meta to store values. These are also cached nicely so makes for slightly faster page loads.

    Check them all out at:

    http://www.gorgeousgamers.com/

    Brad

    #39447

    In reply to: Fans

    Burt Adsit
    Participant

    What a good idea Andy. Floating these feature trial balloons again? Well you don’t fool me for a minute Andy. :)

    Not so private joke people. Never mind. Hello donnacha.

    This is a good idea. I like that alot. Fans could have some twitter ‘following’ type of aspect to it. Kinda like an activity stream for the people I’m fans of. What would be the term you would apply to those people I’m fans of? Seriously. I don’t know what to call them.

    #39289
    jalien
    Participant

    Just to wrap up this post. I went into /mu-plugins/bp-blogs/bp-blogs-classes.php and searched for “public”. At each instance where **public=1, I changed it to -1 so that it would recognize the setting from dsader’s More Privacy Options. This is not the most elegant solution, but it works for what I want. It prevents anyone from accessing the WPMU/BuddyPress site without logging in, and makes sure that the blogs appear as public once the users are logged in. If a user wanted to a blog could still be made private using the two other privacy options with More Privacy Options, only blog users can see the blog, and only site-admin can see the blog.

    Hope this helps anyone who has similar situations. Of course it could be refined even further by adding a conditional so that public=1 becomes (public=1 || public=-1), didn’t try it, but something like this should work too.

    #39228
    Burt Adsit
    Participant

    I wish I could just point to one spot in the code and say “here’s where the privacy of a blog is determined” but there isn’t one. I looked through the file /mu-plugins/bp-blogs/bp-blogs-classes.php and found 1/2 dozen spots where functions are asked to return a list of blogs. They all go out and query the wpmu database and in all cases rely on wpmu’s settings for a blog being ‘public’ or not.

    You are welcome to take a look for yourself in that file. An example of the problem would be the function BP_Blogs_Blog::get_all()

    In that function are two SQL queries that return only public blogs by asking for results: WHERE wb.public = 1

    public = 1 is the wpmu indication that this blog is ‘public’. dsader’s plugin simply changes that ‘1’ to -1, -2 or -3 in the table to indicate the ‘more privacy’ options and then looks for those values. It’s behavior is dependent on the values in that spot in the table also.

    I don’t see any way to accomplish what you want without a complete rewrite of that entire class. It’s designed to *not* return results for private blogs. That’s exactly what it’s doing.

    #39222
    Burt Adsit
    Participant

    You’ll get a message that the user hasn’t created any public blogs when you browse to their profile and just look at their blogs. It’s correct. The don’t have any ‘public’ blogs in bp. The blog directory will never show private blogs. The blogs you have designated as ‘registered users only’ in more privacy are now private blogs. They will not show in the directory.

    Right now bp’s view of privacy is black and white. It either is public or it’s not. No shades of grey there yet.

    dsader’s more privacy plugin was created before bp. bp doesn’t know about this plugin. The two are completely unaware of each other. Both are behaving normally but not in concert.

    #39213
    Burt Adsit
    Participant

    I guess it doesn’t matter what option you have selected in ‘more privacy’. bp will always think that a blog with anything other than the standard public setting is private. Exactly where and when are you getting a message you didn’t before?

    If you use dsader’s plugin and choose any setting other than the first one “I would like my blog to be visible to everyone, including search engines (like Google, Sphere, Technorati) and archivers and in public listings around this site.” then the blog becomes ‘private’ according to bp.

    All other settings.

    #39068

    You could look into modifying an existing WordPress plugin, I think called “a member” that will help you with your pay for subscription situation.

    BuddyPress certainly could have “private” blogs, you would just need to restrict user access to each others blogs by checking the available author ID’s against the current blog ID, and if they aren’t an author, bounce them back somewhere.

    Sounds like BuddyPress will be a very good starting point for you, you will just need to mold it to fit your needs.

Viewing 25 results - 3,776 through 3,800 (of 3,869 total)
Skip to toolbar