Search Results for 'wordpress'
-
AuthorSearch Results
-
January 7, 2010 at 2:41 pm #60274
Jean-Pierre Michaud
Participanta lot of sentences used inside the system are from WordPress MU… did you look at this language file?
January 7, 2010 at 7:41 am #60243In reply to: Terminology – Apples to Oranges
Paul Wong-Gibbs
KeymasterThere have been at least two nights of discussion in the WordPress and WordPress MU IRC dev channels about this. Tonight will be a third night of discussion, I’m sure, in the WordPress meeting.
As the naming of WordPress features isn’t something that is to do with BuddyPress directly, I kindly suggest you visit the WP or WPMU forums — or IRC — and contribute to existing threads so that your comments will be seen by more people.
January 7, 2010 at 12:25 am #60214In reply to: Removing Activiation
r-a-y
KeymasterNice, Brajesh!
Have you updated your auto-activate plugin lately?
In your comments, you mention you were going to update the plugin in November, but the last update was in October.
Also, has using this plugin affected spam registrations for you, Brajesh?
January 6, 2010 at 11:10 pm #60204In reply to: Terminology – Apples to Oranges
Brajesh Singh
ParticipantMy view is quiet different on this issue. I have already seen the chat log where it all was proposed and ms- prefix was associated.
My point is calling Blogs in wp 3.0 as site, is completely incorrect(unless someone convinces me here).
Let us concentrate on what WordPress Mu blogs offer out of the box, It is nothing more than the blog functionality(at the moment).
Obviously you can customize the blogs and wordpress plugins/themes(and wordpress itself) has the capability that a blog can be converted as a Site.
But again, Calling it as Multisite out of the box is a strong no no for me because of the obvious reasons.
Let us consider the usage, How many sites out there are using wpmu as a Multi Site software. 2%-5%(that is my personal experience+expectation,actual data may be different).
Yes, wordpress mu is mainly used for network of blogs(checkout the wpmu showcase) and one or 2 blogs on the network(most of the time, the main domain) act as the Site(or full featured site).
So calling every blog out there as a site will be completely unjustifiable.
January 6, 2010 at 10:57 pm #60203In reply to: Terminology – Apples to Oranges
Bowe
ParticipantThe thing that exites me the most about the merge is all the experienced WordPress developers being introduced to a whole new platform to work on and develop for. I can’t wait to stop having to ask the same question over and over again; Is is WPMU compatible? Never no more!
@Peter: *deep sigh*
January 6, 2010 at 10:32 pm #60196In reply to: Terminology – Apples to Oranges
@mercime
ParticipantSaw the thread about the “baptismal name” for the 3.0 version. My two cents for the branding of the new WP 3.0 – WordPress NW (for network and looks like new too
but that’s up to the top honchos so I’m not going to sweat it. But we have to bear in mind that WPMU was not only used for multiple blogs and multiple sites using Donncha’s Domain Mapping plugin only.I’ve also used WPMU as CMS for associations/organizations and the subblogs are used for mangement of either Departments or Sections areas including “Job sections” or “Prayer sections” – where each Admin/Editor is accountable for maintaining such, among other great things you can do with WPMU.
Looking at some of the changes in the merge specially with deprecating WPMU functions I see that it would be easier to upgrade single WP installs to WP 3.0 (as should be the case) than it would be upgrading WPMU installs to WP 3.0. – specially the WPMU installs with many customizations in frontend and backend including plugins hooking in wpmu_ (ouch!), tell me it ain’t so
January 6, 2010 at 9:39 pm #60192In reply to: Terminology – Apples to Oranges
Bowe
ParticipantIt’s funny because when I first found out about WPMU is was indeed wildy confused about what it meant exactly. Already familiar with single WordPress I installed WPMU because I wanted to use BuddyPress and thought it was some kind of special version of WordPress (not realizing the Network of blogs/sites kinda thing).
After I got BuddyPress up and running and started a blog I got launched into another admin panel which suddently missed all kinds of menu options and had a different name.. “WTF is going on here” was my initial response..
Until I realised that WPMU actually allowed me to setup multiple blogs from one panel and would allow me to create a network of sites!
This name change is a good thing and much easier to grasp. It does make me think; should I call new blogs on my network “sites” or “blogs”.
January 6, 2010 at 6:33 pm #60172In reply to: Removing Activiation
Paul Wong-Gibbs
KeymasterThe same way you stop WordPress MU from requiring email activation.
January 6, 2010 at 5:18 pm #60163In reply to: buddypress-mu possible yet?
John James Jacoby
Keymaster@anointed, if you wanted to just make it so you’re grabbing the user list of a blog instead of the members list, that’s very possible to do. But you will still probably want your root blog to be the center of all members.
Like andrea_r said, I imagine that MU is in a feature freeze at the moment until 3.0. All the devs are going to have their hands full rearranging the code to make it fit into normal WordPress so it’s a smooth transition for everyone.
January 6, 2010 at 2:50 pm #60161In reply to: buddypress-mu possible yet?
Andrea Rennick
ParticipantWhere the actual work happens, in trac. Yesterday, merge work started, so I’m not sure where to put a suggestion like this right now.
If you stick it in https://trac.mu.wordpress.org/report I know it will get read by Donncha.
Also, user management is changing, so you may want to play around with wpmu 2.9.1 rc-1 a bit before filing any tickets.
January 6, 2010 at 4:14 am #60141In reply to: buddypress-mu possible yet?
Anointed
ParticipantDoes anyone know where I should go to make a suggestion for wordpress-mu itself that may possibly be read by the devs?
I really think the only thing holding me back from doing this project is a core change in wp, to allow assigning a user to a particular blog or blogs. With 3.0 being the ‘final’ wp-mu merge, it would seem to be a great time to add this functionality. I just don’t know where to post the suggestions.
January 6, 2010 at 12:53 am #60124In reply to: Single WP supported on latest trunk
kineda
ParticipantThanks. That clears things up. The only other problem I’ve encountered is after I deactivate the BuddyPress plugin and re-activate it, I’ll get the follow db errors:
WordPress database error: [Duplicate key name ‘useritem’]
ALTER TABLE wp_bp_notifications ADD KEY useritem (user_id, is_new)
WordPress database error: [Table ‘wp_bp_activity’ already exists]
RENAME TABLE wp_bp_activity_user_activity_cached TO wp_bp_activity
WordPress database error: [Duplicate entry ‘1’ for key 1]
INSERT INTO wp_bp_xprofile_groups VALUES ( 1, ‘Base’, ”, 0 );
WordPress database error: [Duplicate entry ‘1’ for key 1]
INSERT INTO wp_bp_xprofile_fields ( id, group_id, parent_id, type, name, is_required, can_delete ) VALUES ( 1, 1, 0, ‘textbox’, ‘Name’, 1, 0 );
January 5, 2010 at 9:08 pm #60103In reply to: Single WP supported on latest trunk
Andy Peatling
KeymasterIt does indeed work with WordPress 2.9, however none of my registered members are showing up. The only account that shows up in the member listing is the admin account.
The default members page filter is “active members”. If they haven’t logged in and been active since BuddyPress was activated they will not show. If you change the filter to “Alphabetical” or something else, they will show.
January 5, 2010 at 8:28 pm #60091In reply to: Single WP supported on latest trunk
kineda
ParticipantIt does indeed work with WordPress 2.9, however none of my registered members are showing up. The only account that shows up in the member listing is the admin account.
January 5, 2010 at 7:38 pm #60081In reply to: Inbox Widget for BuddyPress
David Carson
ParticipantErich73, The notifications tab alerts users to more than the latest private messages. But it’s up to you whether you want to remove it or not.
FYI – I just checked the Inbox Widget plugin into the repository –
https://wordpress.org/extend/plugins/inbox-widget/
Screenshot –
https://wordpress.org/extend/plugins/inbox-widget/screenshots/
This is not a stable version and it will only work on sites running the latest trunk version of BP (2243+) with the bp-default theme enabled. It’s just something to build on and I’m hoping to add improvements soon.
January 5, 2010 at 6:34 pm #60074In reply to: Feature Request: Hastags
David Lewis
ParticipantJanuary 5, 2010 at 5:00 pm #60070peterverkooijen
ParticipantThat’s how BP works. There is almost no security, privacy and member management built into BP. The focus is on expanding features.
There are various efforts underway to bolt better management on via plugins etc. This plugin for example offers new member moderation.
Jeff Sayre is working on a privacy component, but apparently has decided he needs to be compensated – and rightly so!
January 5, 2010 at 1:34 pm #60056In reply to: Blog saying page not found
bbrian017
ParticipantJanuary 5, 2010 at 9:11 am #60051In reply to: Single WP supported on latest trunk
kineda
ParticipantIs the BuddyPress theme required for BuddyPress to work on an existing WordPress install… or can we pick and choose pieces from the official BP theme and incorporate as needed? I’m assuming the latter, but wanted to be sure before I start to hack away.
January 5, 2010 at 6:58 am #60045In reply to: Should I still use bp_custom.php in BP 1.1.x?
John James Jacoby
Keymasterbp-custom.php loads up before any BuddyPress components do, and functions.php loads after all plugins and WordPress core code does.
So it isn’t a matter of “if,” it’s a matter of “why.”
Basically…
Use bp-custom.php to override core BuddyPress settings like slugs or constant values, or to load specific code BEFORE BuddyPress loads for whatever reason you might need to.
Use functions.php if you need to add actions or filters to BuddyPress things. It’s good practice to make sure that actions and filters exist before attaching code to them. If you add a filter to a function that doesn’t exist yet, or you add it before/after the code is loaded/executed, then you’re ahead/behind the action/filter curve, so to speak.
Different files for different purposes.
January 5, 2010 at 4:46 am #60039In reply to: Bugs after moving install to secondary blog
Xevo
ParticipantI could see why that wouldnt work, as buddypress is build on wpmu and every blog you make is basicly a seperate wordpress install. So for example the users that were automatically subscribers on your wpmu blog aren’t automatically subscribers on all the blogs on your wpmu install.
WordPress itself has problems with relocating it’s position, a lot of changes need to be made and since buddypress is build on wordpress, buddypress has these problems now as well.
I don’t really get why your placing buddypress in a sub blog, you can easily change the buddypress theme to your liking if that’s the problem.
January 5, 2010 at 4:32 am #60037In reply to: How to make pages ……….
Xevo
ParticipantJust need to add the core wordpress function to list the pages into the buddypress theme and it should show your newly added pages to the main menu.
January 5, 2010 at 4:28 am #60036In reply to: How to make pages ……….
hkcharlie
Participantty Peter
OK – I can make pages in the regular wordpress part and see them in the back end, but they do not appear on the buddypress theme. There is no menu option for them.
The “this is helpful” is indeed helpful, but isn’t the point of a content management system like worpress. I’d like to press a button to add new pages easily.
I think either the buddypress theme doesn’t show new pages in a menu or I have missed something to turn on or off.
redyor
ParticipantThanks Simon for Sharing !
Are you referring to the following BP Events plugin?
January 4, 2010 at 7:48 pm #60010peterverkooijen
ParticipantI’d like to use the features in the widgets, specifically site wide activity in 1.1.3, but want more control over the layout than the widget system provides – see this obnoxious codex page that says you must use unordered lists or else…
Where/how can I find the code that widgets add to the pages? I’d like to just add that code to my template pages, perhaps via template tags.
Apologies if this is thread hijacking, but I suspect finding the original code would also solve thecorkboard’s problem and clear up confusion over versions.
-
AuthorSearch Results