Search Results for 'spam'
-
AuthorSearch Results
-
March 19, 2010 at 1:37 pm #69219
Paul Wong-Gibbs
KeymasterWindhamdavid, your post got marked as spam by askimet (spelling?). I’m just going through the spam bin atm.
March 19, 2010 at 1:08 pm #69212In reply to: Spam, Spam and more spam
Hugo Ashmore
ParticipantThe phrase “Famous last words” springs to mind

But post back with update if still not getting spam maybe I’ll do the same with proxy bans
March 19, 2010 at 12:48 pm #69211In reply to: Spam, Spam and more spam
David Lewis
Participant@Kunal17: I’m sure that’s probably just a coincidence.
@pushi22le: That’s a new tip. Thanks :o)
BTW… since banning proxies from accessing my site… I haven’t had a single SPAM signup.
March 19, 2010 at 3:17 am #69154In reply to: Spam, Spam and more spam
Kunal17
ParticipantI upgraded to bp1.2.2.1/wp2.9.2 from bp1.1.2/bp2.8.6 a couple of days ago and the spam on my site has significantly increased.
I also noticed that spammers from previously banned domains are now able to register.
March 18, 2010 at 1:59 pm #68969Ted Mann
ParticipantI’ve been getting pummeled with spam signups ever since the BP_REGISTER_SLUG stopped working throughout the site. I used R-A-Y’s idea of just having an .htaccess redirect. Just curious: If others have taken that approach, does it indeed cut down on spam signups?
March 18, 2010 at 12:06 pm #68954In reply to: Spam, Spam and more spam
pushi22le
ParticipantThe BP demo site is also full of spam. Very interesting.
March 17, 2010 at 9:38 pm #68865In reply to: BuddyPress-Links 0.3 FINAL is here at last
MrMaz
Participant@agrunder
I have added the feeds idea to my list of requests. If I get a bunch of requests I will consider adding that feature.
Link avatars are already stored in a separate directory under wp-content/blogs.dir/files/link-avatars. I wonder if maybe this is not the case for single WP? I still need to do a bunch more testing.
The thumbnails that are uploaded are handled very much like the other BuddyPress avatars, and nearly all of the functionality for handling them is re-used as far as code goes. Right now the original “should” be getting resized down to 450×450 on upload, and then a copy down to 150×150 and 50×50 after the crop. All of these dimensions are determined by BP constants.
The thumbs are scaled down via CSS depending on the situation. For instance the 50×50 is used exactly as is.
I have not received much feedback at all regarding real world spam issues with Links, but I know eventually there will be a problem. I want to wait to tackle spam when there are real world use-cases to solve, not hypothetical ones.
What you described is very similar to Digg, and I think would be a cool feature, but maybe not to handle spam. I have planned from the beginning to allow users to set a threshold for negative rated links that would prevent them from showing up, for instance anything rated -5 or lower, don’t show me. The admin could set the default value.
Thanks for taking the time to submit some valuable feedback.
March 17, 2010 at 9:01 pm #68856In reply to: BuddyPress-Links 0.3 FINAL is here at last
agrundner
Member@infution I’m concerned as well about the space the avatars will take up. Right now it uploads the images to the uploads folder in its original size (a problem if you have a fixed sized template area you’re working in).
My wishlist for @MrMaz:
1. Let admins specify a separate directory to use for BP Links avatar images or create a sub-directory in uploads
— Reason: It keeps things separate in case we want to remove BP Links in the future and delete all associated images.
2. Use the setting in WP > Settings > Media to create matching sized thumbnails (i.e. 150×150) and resize images down to the “Medium” image size setting (my max width is currently at 500px).
— Reason: one word… consistency. Plus, it helps keep things manageable.
* I noticed the thumbnail BP Links uses is actually the fullsize stored image — but scaled down per the width, height pixel values.
+++++++
Advanced cool feature I’d like to see…
Links that have been voted down by X number (most likely because they’re spam or totally unrelated) automatically get weeded out and their associated image(s) removed. This would free up a lot a space as well.
March 16, 2010 at 10:12 pm #68670In reply to: Registration Approval Plugin
beeza
ParticipantDid this never get developed? It is a right pain at the moment, I have loads of spam registrations and people posting unsuitable content! Something like a Registration Approval system is very important, spam and abusive posters ruin many a good forum blog etc!
I would have thought something as important as this, would be high on the priority list of available options on buddypress! Or is there something already out there ?
March 16, 2010 at 8:32 pm #68650In reply to: Spam, Spam and more spam
Hugo Ashmore
ParticipantNot necessarily accept, but feeling sort of resigned to, still trying to see the actual process and how the circumvention of so many disparate steps to thwart these little idiots is occurring. I still intend on trying put a stop to these but at the moment not about to waste too much further effort on it, I tend to catch them within minutes of signup and remove them so it doesn’t upset the community too much.
Another step I took was to place a trap on php curl scripts attempting to download the register page, that put a stop to a few signups I think.
March 16, 2010 at 7:48 pm #68642In reply to: Spam, Spam and more spam
David Lewis
ParticipantThey could be legitimate proxies… yes… but I’m assuming they are in the minority.
I don’t think I have no referer rules. I’ll look into that.
So you just accept it? What a pain.
March 16, 2010 at 12:30 pm #68581In reply to: Spam, Spam and more spam
Hugo Ashmore
ParticipantHmm proxy servers could be legitimate though, couldn’t they?
I empathise with the issue I still have to delete on average a dozen a day and have employed al the suggested fixes and a few domain blocks and no referer htaccess rules.
March 16, 2010 at 12:16 pm #68578In reply to: Spam, Spam and more spam
David Lewis
ParticipantI just clued in that these bots are probably all using proxy servers… and compiling a big list of them all would be futile. So I found this htaccess code that blocks servers based on their methods. I know this topic has gone beyond specific BuddyPress fixes… but I’ve done all of the BuddyPress fixed (and more) and I’m STILL getting SPAM signups. So perhaps this will help someone else.
RewriteEngine On
# block proxy servers from site access
RewriteCond %{HTTP:VIA} !^$ [OR]
RewriteCond %{HTTP:USERAGENT_VIA} !^$ [OR]
RewriteCond %{HTTP:FORWARDED-FOR} !^$ [OR]
RewriteCond %{HTTP:FORWARDED} !^$ [OR]
RewriteCond %{HTTP:X-FORWARDED-FOR} !^$ [OR]
RewriteCond %{HTTP:X-FORWARDED} !^$ [OR]
RewriteCond %{HTTP:PROXY_CONNECTION} !^$ [OR]
RewriteCond %{HTTP:XPROXY_CONNECTION} !^$ [OR]
RewriteCond %{HTTP:XROXY_CONNECTION} !^$ [OR]
RewriteCond %{HTTP:HTTP_PC_REMOTE_ADDR} !^$ [OR]
RewriteCond %{HTTP:HTTP_CLIENT_IP} !^$
RewriteRule ^(.*)$ - [F]Credit goes to: http://perishablepress.com/press/2008/04/20/how-to-block-proxy-servers-via-htaccess/
March 16, 2010 at 1:26 am #68529In reply to: Spam, Spam and more spam
David Lewis
ParticipantJust got another registration from a .info email address. It occurs to me that that is not necessarily the domain they are coming from since my htaccess deny had no effect. The email ban setting also had no effect. Nor does hashcash or any of the other multiple measures I have put in place. I have no idea what to do anymore. I’ve tried everything. I’m resorting now to banning individual IP’s as they come in.
March 15, 2010 at 6:48 pm #68472In reply to: Invite Friends From Profile
gregfielding
ParticipantOne quick thought…if you haven’t thought of this already…
There should be a cap of maybe 25 or so people that can be invited at any one time. No spamming
March 15, 2010 at 3:30 pm #68432In reply to: Spam, Spam and more spam
David Lewis
ParticipantI’ll try. I just got a new registration from ANOTHER .info email address. Minutes ago. Ugh
Unreal.I’ve done everything mentioned in this thread and MORE. And no dice. Kind of at my wits end. How the heck are they signing up?! Unless it’s humans signing up. But I assume all SPAMers use bots. Even if it’s not a bot… I don’t know how you’d ever find the signup page with Google. It has a custom slug and I’ve gotten rid of the default BuddyPress text.
Anyway. Thanks Andrea.
I wonder if this would work in .htaccess
deny from .*\\.info.*March 15, 2010 at 3:27 pm #68431In reply to: Spam, Spam and more spam
Andrea Rennick
Participant/.*\.info/
that might work. it was buggy at one point.
March 15, 2010 at 2:21 pm #68417In reply to: Spam, Spam and more spam
David Lewis
Participant@Andrea_r How do your say “SPAMbots please screw off” in Latin? LOL. Maybe Google can translate for me.
No more SPAM registrations since my last post. Fingers crossed.
Did you find out how to use regex in the WPMU “banned domains” setting?
March 15, 2010 at 12:11 pm #68404In reply to: Spam, Spam and more spam
Andrea Rennick
ParticipantThat string is also translatable, meaning you can replace it. Doesn’t have to be with another language.
March 15, 2010 at 9:35 am #68384In reply to: Not a spammer but marked as a spammer?
pcwriter
ParticipantAdd the standard instructions to your registration page for new users to whitelist yourdomain.com in their email accounts.
March 15, 2010 at 8:48 am #68382In reply to: Not a spammer but marked as a spammer?
Andy Peatling
KeymasterThe users who register need to activate their accounts. They are not marked as a spammer (user_status = 1) they are marked as not active (user_status = 2). Until they activate their account they cannot log in.
If your emails are being marked as spam or phishing then this is likely something to do with the domain or IP address of your site. It has probably been black flagged.
March 15, 2010 at 8:05 am #68379In reply to: Not a spammer but marked as a spammer?
janec
ParticipantOK…. I think I know the problem – members who do not click on the activation link will be marked as spammers automatically!
There is just one problem – when I test-registered with one of my email addresses (I used gmail) – gmail automatically trashed the confirmation email AND puts a big red warning sign that said the message was potentially a phishing email.
NO WONDER… my users are probably thinking that it was a fake email or a phishing email IF they even see the confirmation email at all.
Is this an issue that is being brought to attention with buddypress developers?
March 15, 2010 at 7:48 am #68377In reply to: Not a spammer but marked as a spammer?
janec
Participantthanks – but I am not on MU – I am on a regular wordpress v. 2.9.2 using the buddypress plug-in.
The same thing is happening for another one of my sites where I am using a buddypress plug-in for wordpress 2.9.2. That new user was marked as a spammer even though she is definitely not one!
March 15, 2010 at 7:41 am #68376In reply to: Not a spammer but marked as a spammer?
Brajesh Singh
ParticipantIf you are on Wordoress Mu
Dashboard->SiteAdmin->Users
search his username and check it, then there is a button above the listing for Not Spammer, that should do it.
March 15, 2010 at 4:48 am #68361In reply to: BP mark as spammers acts wierd in 1.2.2.1
djsteve
ParticipantThanks for the info Paul!
-
AuthorSearch Results